Boal v. Metropolitan Museum of Art of City of New York
Decision Date | 17 March 1924 |
Docket Number | 51. |
Citation | 298 F. 894 |
Parties | BOAL et al. v. METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
William E. Carnochan and Herbert Parsons, both of New York City (Theodore C. Richards, of New York City, Warren H. Atwood, of Ayer, Mass., and Lyman K. Clark, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellants.
De Forest Bros., of New York City (Robert Thorne, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Dorman & Dana, of New York City (William R. Tillinghast, of Providence, R.I., William R. Dorman, of New York City, James C.
Collins of Providence, R.I., and Zachariah Chafee, Jr., of Cambridge, Mass., of counsel), for appellee Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co.
Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
This case involves the last will and testament of Theodore M. Davis, who at the time of his death on February 23, 1915, had his domicile at Newport, in the state of Rhode Island. His will was dated August 14, 1911, and a codicil thereto was dated October 4, 1911, and both were admitted to probate in the Newport probate court. Letters testamentary were issued to Thomas L. Manson, one of the two executors named in the will; the other person named, Herbert Parsons, having declined to qualify. Mr. Manson died in May, 1918, without having fully administered the estate, and on May 27, 1918, the defendant Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company was appointed administrator with the will annexed. Mr. Davis was survived by his widow, Annie B. Davis, and by the plaintiff Kate Atwood, a half-sister, and Gertrude Galloway, his sister, who were his only heirs and next of kin. Thereafter both Mrs. Davis and Mrs. Galloway died. The plaintiff Theodore Davis Boal is the executor of the will of Mrs. Davis, and the plaintiff Kate Atwood is the administratrix of the estate of Mrs. Galloway.
The seventh paragraph of the will of Mr. Davis, and the one involved herein, is as follows:
The claim of the plaintiffs is that the seventh clause is void, and that they, admittedly entitled to whatever portion of the testator's estate he did not validly dispose of by his will, are entitled to the Egyptian collection and other works of art, collectively referred to as the art collection, which the testator undertook, unsuccessfully, to dispose of in the seventh clause.
The bill alleges that the art collection is, at the time the suit is brought, within the Southern district of New York and is held by the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The interest of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and that of Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company, the defendants herein, rests upon the seventh and ninth clauses above set forth. The amended bill of complaint asked: That the claim of the complainants to the art collection be enforced, and that the incumbrances, liens, and clouds upon the title to the collection asserted by the defendants be removed. That the court decree that the bequest of the art collection sought to be made by the seventh paragraph of the will fails, and that the collection pursuant to the ninth paragraph belongs to the residuary estate, and as such belongs one-fourth to the complainant Kate Atwood individually, and one-fourth to her as administratrix of the estate of Gertrude Galloway, deceased, and one-half to the complainant Theodore Davis Boal as executor of the will of Annie B. Davis, deceased. That the Metropolitan Museum of Art be directed by the decree to transfer and deliver the art collection to the complainants upon receiving their receipt therefor.
The bill also asked that the court enjoin the Metropolitan Museum of Art, pending a determination of the proceedings, from transferring the art collection or any part thereof from the state of New York or from its possession, other than to the complainants. The court below entered a decree dismissing the bill upon the merits.
Before proceeding further it should be stated that on August 14 1911, the date when Mr. Davis executed his will, but before its execution, he signed a trust deed dated that day. By this trust deed, as counsel for the plaintiffs have pointed out, Mr. Davis provided for certain trusts of which he thereby appointed the defendant the Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company trustee. Two days later, on August 16, 1911, he acknowledged the execution of this trust deed and delivered it to the trust...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Byrd v. Wallis
... ... 767; Barton v ... King, 41 Miss. 288; Boal v. Metropolitan ... Museum, 298 F. 894; Henderson v ... ...
-
E. Henry Wemme Co. v. Selling
... ... in Couch's Addition to the city of Portland, and also ... lots one (1) and four (4), ... v ... Egleston, 185 N.Y. 23, 77 N.E. 989; Boal v ... Metropolitan Ins. Co. (C. C. A.) 298 F. 894; ... ...
-
State v. Underwood
... ... Trust Company, 53 P.2d 33; Trustees of Gate City Guard v ... Atlanta (Ga.) 39 S.W. 394. In the present ... Boal ... v. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 298 F. 894-908; Evan ... New York, but the rule that no conveyance from the old to the ... ...
-
National Bank of Greece v. Savarika
... ... & Ritchie v. Kurtz (U. S.), 7 L.Ed. 521; City of ... Cincinnati. v. The Lessee of White, 8 L.Ed. 452; ... and goes with it ... Boal v ... Metropolitan Museum of Art, 298 F. 894, C. C. A ... Executors to Ralli Bros. of New York City, with directions to ... forward six thousand dollars, ... ...