Board of Commissioners of Wells County v. Fahlor

Citation31 N.E. 1112,132 Ind. 426
Decision Date12 October 1892
Docket Number13,050
PartiesThe Board of Commissioners of Wells County et al. v. Fahlor
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Wells Circuit Court.

Judgment affirmed.

J. S. Daily, L. Mock, L. B. Simmons, E. R. Wilson and J. J. Todd, for appellants.

N. Burwell, for appellee.

OPINION

Elliott, J.

This case is in this court for the second time. Fahlor v. Board, etc., 101 Ind. 167. A branch of the subject-matter of this controversy, exhibiting some of the facts and questions contained in the record now before us was considered in Johnson v. Board, etc., 107 Ind. 15, 8 N.E. 1. The cases to which we have referred lay down two leading rules which govern this case.

First. Notice is essential to confer jurisdiction in proceedings for the establishment of a public road, where an adjacent owner's land is sought to be subjected to a special assessment.

Second. Where judicial proceedings are void because of an entire absence of notice to a property owner, a subsequent statute assuming to validate such proceedings is invalid.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Horton v. Carter, 8 Div. 528
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 2, 1950
    ... ... proceedings in the probate court of Marshall County to have certain real property set aside to her as a ... 324; Pryor v. Downey, 50 Cal. 388, 19 Am.Rep. 656; Board of Comm. of Wells County v. Fahlor, 132 Ind. 426, 31 N.E ... ...
  • John Goodrich v. City of Detroit
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1902
    ...A number of cases are cited which, it is argued, give countenance to this position. Paul v. Detroit, 32 Mich. 108; Wells County v. Fahlor, 132 Ind. 426, 31 N. E. 1112; State v. Fond du Lac, 42 Wis. 287; Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N. Y. 183, 30 Am. Rep. 289; Scott v. Toledo, 1 L. R. A. 688, 36 Fed......
  • the National Bank of Battle Creek, Michigan v. Lock
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1892

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT