Board of Directors of Miller Levee Dist. No. 2 v. Prairie Pipe Line Co.
Decision Date | 09 August 1923 |
Docket Number | 6159. |
Citation | 292 F. 474 |
Parties | BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MILLER LEVEE DIST. NO. 2 v. PRAIRIE PIPE LINE CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Rehearing Denied September 21, 1923.
Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for appellant.
David C. Arnold, of Texarkana, Ark., and H. C. Black, of Independence, Kan. (W. H. Arnold and W. H. Arnold, Jr., both of Texarkana, Ark., and T. J. Flannelly and Paul B. Mason both of Independence, Kan., on the brief), for appellee.
Before LEWIS, Circuit Judge, and BOOTH and JOHNSON, District Judges.
This is a suit by appellant, plaintiff below, brought in the Sixth chancery district of Arkansas, against various defendants to collect unpaid levee taxes. Appellee, one of the defendants removed its controversy to the federal court, where it was tried. From the decree entered in favor of defendant this appeal was taken.
The material allegations of the bill are that the Miller levee district No. 2 had been created by Act No. 69 of the General Assembly of Arkansas of the year 1911, as amended by Act No 71 of the year 1913; that plaintiff by virtue of the powers granted to it by said acts, and in accordance with the requirements thereof, had levied a tax of 6 per cent. ad valorem upon the assessed valuation of the real estate within said district for the year 1919; that lying within said levee district, among other lands assessed, were six miles of oil pipe lines belonging to defendant, assessed at $42,690; that the amount of the levee taxes for 1919 against defendant was $2,561.40, which became delinquent April 10, 1920, and, with a penalty of $640.35, making a total of $3,201.75, was still due and unpaid.
The defenses set up by the defendant in its answer, may be summarized as follows: (1) No levy or assessment was ever made against any of the property of the defendant; (2) no property of the defendant located within the confines of Miller levee district No. 2 ever appeared upon the real estate assessment book of Miller county, which was designated by the Legislature as the basis for the alleged levy and assessment; (3) all property of the defendant in the district is personal property, and therefore not subject to assessment for local improvements under the Constitution of Arkansas; (4) the pipe line of the defendant is in no manner benefited by the improvements of plaintiff; (5) the alleged assessment against the pipe line of the defendant is wholly arbitrary, illogical, injurious, discriminatory, and void, being in violation of section 5, article 16, of the Arkansas Constitution, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The decree of the court below was based on the fourth ground of defense.
We take up the last contention first, namely, that the assessment violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Sections 1 and 4 of the act, as amended, creating the levee district, provide:
Two matters must be inquired about: (1) The actual valuation adopted as a basis for the assessment; (2) the method by which the valuation was reached.
1. It is to be noted that the law adopts the 'valuation as it shall appear each year upon the real estate assessment book for the county. ' The valuation in fact used by the board in fixing the tax against defendant was not the valuation of lands owned by the defendant appearing upon the real estate assessment book of the county, although there was on said assessment book a valuation of lands which were owned by the company. These lands, however, did not include right of way for the pipe lines. But the valuation used by the board was that which appeared upon the 'personal assessment and personal tax book,' and covered, as stated by the Arkansas tax commission--
The total assessed valuation of defendant's property under this heading was, in Miller county, $575,671, of which $42,692 was allocated to school district No. 32, and this latter amount was adopted by plaintiff as the assessed valuation within the levee district, inasmuch as the pipe line of the defendant within the levee district was, with the exception of a very small portion, within school district No. 32. In the present discussion we shall assume, but without so deciding, that for the purpose of this levee assessment, the pipe line-- i.e., the right of way and the pipe-- in the levee district was properly considered as real estate, although the pipe line did not appear on the real estate assessment book.
There were...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. May
...R. Co. v. Road Improvement Dist. No. 1 of Hot Springs County, Ark., et al. (C. C. A.) 288 F. 502; Board of Directors of Miller Levee Dist. No. 2 v. Prairie Pipe Co. (C. C. A.) 292 F. 474; Thornton et al. v. Road Imp. Dist. No. 1 of Clark County, Ark., et al. (C. C. A.) 291 F. 518; Road Imp.......
-
Labaddie Bottoms River Protection Dist. of Franklin County v. Randall
... ... "Levee District" corporation under what is now ... Dist., ... 233 Mo.App. 921, 111 S.W.2d 946. (2) On the facts stated in ... plaintiff's amended ... P. 1111; Chicago & N. Y. Ry. Co. v. Board of ... Supervisors, 165 N.W. 390; Cleveland, ... 479; Board of ... Directors of Levee Dist. v. Prairie Pipe Line Co., 292 ... U.S. 269; Board of Directors of Miller Levee Dist. v ... Prairie Pipe Line Co., 292 ... ...
-
In re Smith-Flynn Com'n Co.
... ... The line of demarcation between the right to appeal and ... April ... 2, 1921, the Commission Company was adjudicated a ... board of directors authorizing the pledging of said ... ...
-
Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Ogden Levee Dist.
...assessment and taxation cannot stand against one so assessed or taxed to his injury." This court, in Board of Directors of Miller Levee Dist. No. 2 v. Prairie Pipe Line Co., 292 F. 474, 479, had under consideration the assessment against the Miller Pipe Line Company made by the Miller levee......