Board of Directors of Ft. Scott Public Library v. City of Ft. Scott
Decision Date | 30 January 1932 |
Docket Number | 30263. |
Parties | BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF FT. SCOTT PUBLIC LIBRARY v. CITY OF FT. SCOTT et al. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
Board of directors of public library, vested with power to own and control property, held to have legal capacity to maintain suit to protect ownership and control (Rev. St. 1923 12--1204, 60--729).
Defendant's deed conveying land to plaintiff in ejectment, without reservation, cannot be defeated by prior oral agreement.
1. An administrative board, vested with the power to own and control property, has the legal capacity to maintain a suit in the courts to protect its ownership and control of such property.
2. A deed conveying land without any reservation in which the defendant is grantor and the plaintiff grantee, when admitted in evidence, establishes a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff in an ejectment action, and cannot be defeated by an oral agreement made prior to the execution of such deed.
Appeal from District Court, Bourbon County; Charles F. Trinkle Judge.
Action by the Board of Directors of the Fort Scott Public Library against the City of Fort Scott and others. Judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.
Reversed with directions.
A. M. Keene, of Ft. Scott, for appellant.
John L. Connolly, of Ft. Scott, for appellees.
This action is one in ejectment. The defendants prevailed, and the plaintiff appeals.
It is alleged in the petition that the plaintiff is duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Kansas; that it has a legal estate in and is the owner of lot 1 and the north half of lot 3 in block 123, city of Ft. Scott; that it is entitled to the full possession of said real estate, and the defendants unlawfully keep it out of the possession thereof. The answer is a general denial. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Kan. State Fair Bd.
...sue or be sued depends upon express or explicit statutory language, this is not the law in Kansas. See Board of Library Directors v. City of Fort Scott, 134 Kan. 586, 7 P.2d 533 (1932) (capacity to sue or be sued need not be express, but can be implied). In Board of Library Directors, the c......
-
Mashaney v. Bd. of Indigents' Def. Servs., 108,353
...(1985). The statutory authority [for suit] need not be express, but can be implied. See Board of Library Directors v. City of Ft. Scott, 134 Kan. 586, 588, 7 P.2d 533 (1932)." Lindenman v. Umscheid, 255 Kan. 610, 628-29, 875 P.2d 964 (1994). Mashaney concedes that there is no express statut......
-
Mashaney v. Bd. of Indigents' Def. Servs.
...(1985). The statutory authority [for suit] need not be express, but can be implied. See Board of Library Directors v. City of Ft. Scott, 134 Kan. 586, 588, 7 P.2d 533 (1932).” Lindenman v. Umscheid, 255 Kan. 610, 628–29, 875 P.2d 964 (1994).Mashaney concedes that there is no express statuto......
-
Lindenman v. Umscheid
...601, 606, 702 P.2d 311 (1985). The statutory authority need not be express, but can be implied. See Board of Library Directors v. City of Ft. Scott, 134 Kan. 586, 588, 7 P.2d 533 (1932). For example, the statutorily conferred power of a subordinate government agency to own and control prope......