Board of Revenue v. Jansen, 1 Div. 707.

Decision Date28 January 1932
Docket Number1 Div. 707.
PartiesBOARD OF REVENUE ET AL. v. JANSEN.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Claude A. Grayson, Judge.

Petition of Vernol R. Jansen for mandamus to the Board of Revenue and Road Commissioners of Mobile County and the members thereof. From a judgment awarding the writ, defendants appeal.

Reversed and rendered.

Gordon Edington & Leigh, of Mobile, for appellants.

V. R Jansen, of Mobile, for appellee.

FOSTER J.

We are not here in any respect concerned with the value to the county of the amendment to section 402, Code, effective by House Bill 429, Legislature 1931 (Gen. Acts 1931, p. 293). The only question submitted to us on this appeal is whether said amendatory act of 1931 is in violation of section 45 Constitution, in respect to its title. The title is in effect only that section 402 (as previously amended) is thereby amended, not giving a suggestion as to the nature of the proposed amendment. Section 402, Code, dealt only with assistants to the probate judge in respect to his duties, in other sections provided, to prepare a list of the qualified electors by precincts and in alphabetical order and furnish it to the election inspectors. It also provided for the compensation of the assistants, and that in counties having more than 150,000 population the chairman of the board of registrars shall also assist the probate judge in all matters pertaining to the registration of voters and election matters when called upon by such probate judge. An amendment by the Legislature of 1927 eliminated the duty of the chairman of the board of registrars in such counties to render assistance when called upon. Acts 1927, pp. 274-277.

So that when the Legislature of 1931 undertook to amend it, section 402 only provided for assistants to the judge of probate in the preparation of a list of voters and the delivering of it to the inspectors. The duty to keep and prepare such lists is provided by sections 387,388. It must be made from the registration books or lists filed in his office by the registrars, as provided by sections 396, 401. Section 396 requires the registrars after each meeting for purging the registration list to file in the office of the probate judge the book in which they enter the names of all electors stricken from the list. By section 401 they shall return to the office of the probate judge a registration list by precincts with other stated information. The book containing such list is the official register. Davis v. Teague, 220 Ala. 309, 125 So. 51. By the amendment of 1931 to section 402, provision is made for a clerk to assist the registrars by submitting to them "revised election lists of said county," containing other information as specified, and shall "attend to all clerical work of the Board of Registrars."

It is apparent therefore that, prior to the amendment of 1931 section 402 only related to assistants to the probate judge in the performance of his duties which are distinct from...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • In re Fite
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 9 Junio 1933
    ... 152 So. 246 228 Ala. 4 In re FITE. 6 Div. 216. Supreme Court of Alabama June 9, 1933 ... of Fred Fite to review action of the Board of Commissioners ... of the State Bar disbarring ... review by this court, among other things, are: (1) ... "In all cases in which the evidence, in the ... relating to the revenue laws, the departments of education, ... 533; Board of Revenue v ... Jansen, 224 Ala. 240, 139 So. 358; State ex rel ... ...
  • Department of Indus. Relations v. West Boylston Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 6 Octubre 1949
    ... ... v. WEST BOYLSTON MFG. CO. 3 Div. 532. Supreme Court of Alabama Oct. 6, 1949 ... Keller v. State Board of Education, 236 Ala. 400, ... 183 So. 268 ... to determine the contribution rate as of April 1, ... 1943, and not less than fifteen days before ... 344, 89 Am.St.Rep. 23; Board of Revenue v. Jansen, ... 224 Ala. 240, 139 So. 358; ... ...
  • Pope v. Howle
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 22 Junio 1933
    ... ... 154 POPE v. HOWLE. ALLEN v. COOPER. 7 Div. 162, 163.Supreme Court of AlabamaJune 22, 1933 ... the action of the canvassing board in rejecting the ... twenty-one votes ... Cuninghame, supra; Board of ... Revenue et al. v. Jansen, 224 Ala. 240, 139 So. 358; ... (1) by either of the inspectors, or (2) any ... ...
  • Dorsky v. Brown
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 1 Marzo 1951
    ...Constitution, add a new and different subject. Kendrick v. State, supra; State ex rel. Troy v. Smith, Auditor, supra; Board of Revenue v. Jansen, 224 Ala. 240, 139 So. 358. The subject of Act No. 688, supra, is machines or devices in the nature of coin in the slot or vending machines, which......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT