Bock v. Fellman Dry Goods Co.
Decision Date | 11 June 1919 |
Docket Number | (No. 66-2818.) |
Citation | 212 S.W. 635 |
Parties | BOCK v. FELLMAN DRY GOODS CO. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by Kate Bock against the Fellman Dry Goods Company. From a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (173 S. W. 582), affirming a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error. Judgments reversed, and cause remanded for another trial.
Marsene Johnson, Elmo Johnson, and Roy Johnson, all of Galveston, and Ramsey, Black & Ramsey, of Austin, for plaintiff in error.
Mark H. Royston, of Galveston, and Gill, Jones & Tyler, of Houston, for defendant in error.
The plaintiff in error brought this action against the Fellman Dry Goods Company, a private corporation, to recover damages for the death of her son, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. The trial court, after hearing the evidence, instructed the jury to return a verdict for defendant; and the judgment rendered thereon was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 173 S. W. 582.
The action of the trial court in withdrawing the case from the jury is the only ruling of which complaint is made.
The facts, briefly stated, show that deceased, a boy about 14 years of age, was employed by defendant, and was killed while in the performance of the duties of his employment by falling into an open elevator shaft or well in the store building of defendant in the city of Galveston. Upon the occasion of his injuries, deceased had been sent from the first floor of the building to the second floor into the elevator room, for the purpose of getting some empty boxes. He used the stairway in going to the second floor. Shortly after deceased reached the elevator room, another employé, by the name of Grimm, ran the elevator to the second floor, and, leaving the platform or floor of the elevator flush with the floor of the elevator room, passed through the room where the boy was getting the boxes into the salesroom. Grimm had been in the salesroom but a short time, when he heard a noise like a large box falling. He immediately returned to the elevator shaft, and found that the elevator had ascended to the third floor of the building, and that deceased had fallen to the bottom of the shaft, thus receiving injuries resulting in his death.
The plaintiff alleged that defendant was guilty of negligence in failing to use due care to furnish deceased a reasonably safe place to work, in that: (1) The room in which he was working at the time he met his death, and in which the elevator shaft was situated, was poorly lighted; (2) the floor of said room, and especially near the opening of the elevator shaft, was greasy and slippery; (3) the gate to the elevator, and especially the closing equipment thereof, was defective; and (4) the elevator shaft was insufficiently guarded.
The only testimony which we regard as material to the determination of the question presented is as follows:
George Peters testified:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cech v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Co.
...went to a higher court which reversed the Court of Appeals and held that the issue should have been submitted to the jury. See same case, 212 S.W. 635, where the final opinion is reported. It authority for respondents. Kauffman v. Machin Shirt Co. (Cal.), 140 P. 15, is somewhat similar in i......
-
Cech v. Chemical Co.
...Stewart v. Gas Co. (Mo.), 241 S.W. 909; Daly v. Pryor, 197 Mo. App. 583; Staggs v. Mining Co. (Mo. App.), 199 S.W. 717; Bock v. Dry Goods Co. (Tex.), 212 S.W. 635. (d) Where defendant neglects to provide required safety devices, and an injury occurs which would have been prevented thereby, ......
-
Holcombe v. United States
...ed. 1984) (footnotes omitted). Texas law has never imposed a reasonable doubt standard in proving negligence. See, e.g., Bock v. Fellman Dry Goods Co., 212 S.W. 635, 636 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1919, holding approved)(requiring plaintiff to exclude other probabilities would impermissibly impose "......
-
South Texas Coaches v. Woodard
...Austin Fire Ins. Co. v. Adams-Childers Co., Tex.Com.App., 246 S.W. 365; Young v. Blain, Tex.Com.App., 245 S.W. 65; Bock v. Fellman Dry Goods Co., Tex. Com.App., 212 S.W. 635; 45 C.J., sec. 834, pp. 1162-1264; 20 R.C.L., p. 197, sec. 163; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. McCrearry, Tex.Civ.......