Bodley and Others v. Taylor
Decision Date | 01 February 1809 |
Parties | BODLEY AND OTHERS v. TAYLOR |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial6 cases
-
Sawyer v. Gray
... ... 872; ... Duluth R.R. v. Roy, 173 U.S. 587, 19 Sup.Ct. 549, 43 ... L.Ed. 820; Bodly v. Taylor, 5 Cranch, 191, 3 L.Ed ... 75; Sanford v. Sanford, 139 U.S. 642, 11 Sup.Ct ... 666, 35 L.Ed ... surrendered lands under the act of June 4, 1897, and ... selected others, in the lands so selected, or to render a ... final decree determining the interest of the parties ... ...
-
Sensenderfer v. Smith
...1 Phil. Ev. (5 Am. Ed.) 485; U. S. Rev. Stat., §§ 2369 to 2372; Johnson v. Towsley, 13 Wall. 72; Allison v. Hunter, 9 Mo. 749; Bodley v. Taylor, 5 Cranch 191; Brush v. Ware, 15 Pet. 93; 1 Sto. Eq. Jur., §§ 146, 147 and note; 1 Phil. Ev., pp. 567 to 585, 592; Lester's Land Laws, Vol. 1, pp. ......
-
Giberson v. First Nat. Bank of Spring Lake
...equity, when it needs no explanation except that justice demands it. Over 100 years ago (1809) Chief Justice Marshall, in Bodley v. Taylor, 5 Cranch, 191 (3 L. Ed. 75), with his usual aptness and lucidity, stated the principle underlying the application of this rule in a court of equity as ......
-
Burtis Ringo, James Elliott, John Collins, John Elliott, James Lawrence, Thomas Watson, Athey Rowe, George Muse, Sen and George Muse, Jun Appellants v. Charles Binns and Elijah Hixon, Stephen Hixon, Noah Hixon, John Hixon, William Hixon and Timothy Hixon, Heirs of Timothy Hixon Deceased
...him, and the prior equity will prevail. 5 Rand. 475, 476, 488, 489, 504. These principles were recognized by this court in Bodley v. Taylor, 5 Cranch 191; and in Taylor v. Brown, 5 Cranch 234, it was decided that a subsequent entry, even without fraud, must be postponed to a prior—and altho......
Request a trial to view additional results