Boggs v. Boggs, 9679
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | KENNEDY |
| Citation | 117 S.Ct. 1754,520 U.S. 833,138 L.Ed.2d 45 |
| Parties | Sandra Jean Dale BOGGS, Petitioner, v. Thomas F. BOGGS, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs |
| Docket Number | 9679 |
| Decision Date | 02 June 1997 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
466 practice notes
-
Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., No. 14–181.
...This Court has recognized that "[t]he principal object of [ERISA] is to protect plan participants and beneficiaries." Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833, 845, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997). And "[i]n enacting ERISA, Congress' primary concern was with the mismanagement of funds accumulated......
-
Louisiana Health Service v. Rapides Healthcare, No. 04-31114.
...L.Ed.2d 791 (1997); DeBuono v. NYSA-ILA Med. & Clinical Servs. Fund, 520 U.S. 806, 117 S.Ct. 1747, 138 L.Ed.2d 21 (1997); Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997) (applying traditional preemption analysis in concluding state testamentary laws were preempted as app......
-
U.S. v. Novak, No. 04-55838.
...No. 104-179, at 18 (1995). ERISA is meant to assure that "[r]etirement funds shall remain inviolate until retirement." Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833, 851, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997) (quoting JOHN H. LANGBEIN & BRUCE A. WOLK, PENSIONAND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT LAW 547 (2d ed.1995)) (inter......
-
Plastic Surgery Ctr., P.A. v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., No. 18-3381
...are not preempted. ERISA's "principal object" was "to protect plan participants and beneficiaries." Id. at 946 (quoting Boggs v. Boggs , 520 U.S. 833, 845, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997) ); see 29 U.S.C. § 1001(b) (highlighting "the interests of participants in employee benefit plans......
Request a trial to view additional results
461 cases
-
Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., No. 14–181.
...This Court has recognized that "[t]he principal object of [ERISA] is to protect plan participants and beneficiaries." Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833, 845, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997). And "[i]n enacting ERISA, Congress' primary concern was with the mismanagement of funds accumulated......
-
Plastic Surgery Ctr., P.A. v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., No. 18-3381
...are not preempted. ERISA's "principal object" was "to protect plan participants and beneficiaries." Id. at 946 (quoting Boggs v. Boggs , 520 U.S. 833, 845, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997) ); see 29 U.S.C. § 1001(b) (highlighting "the interests of participants in employee benefit plans......
-
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Ctr., Inc. v. Blue Cross California, Case No.: SA CV 15-0736-DOC (DFMx)
...enforcement comports with ERISA's purpose to protect plan participants and beneficiaries is especially pertinent. See Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833, 845 (1997). 6. The Court has interpreted this regulation without relying on the Department of Labor's website. It therefore does not need to de......
-
Collins v. Southern New England Telephone Co., No. 3:08-cv-00595 (CSH).
...been found to be preempted." 449 F.3d at 431 (quoting Gerosa v. Savasta & Co., 329 F.3d 317, 324 (2d Cir.2003)). 8. Cf. Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833, 860, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997) (Breyer, J., dissenting) (acknowledging that "[t]he `connection' problem is more difficult" than t......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Sec. 403(b) retirement plans: A comparison with 401(k) plans.
...Sec. 1.403(b)-3(b)(3)(i). (77.) Sec. 414(p)(3)(A). (78.) Sec. 414(p)(3)(B). (79.) Secs. 414(p)(11) and (p)(1)(A)(i). (80.) Boggs v. Boggs. 520 U.S. 833 (81.) 29 U.S.C. [section][section]1002(32), 1002(33), 1003(b)(1), and 1003(b)(2); 29 C.F.R. [section]2510.3-2(f). (82.) IRS Letter Rulings ......
-
Sec. 457 government plan distributions compared to 401(k) distributions.
...Act of 2001, P.L. 107-16, [section][section]635(a)(1) and (2); Sec. 414(p)(11). (97.) Platt, T.C. Memo. 2008-17. (98.) Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833 (99.) 29 U.S.C. [section][section]1002(32) and 1003(b)(1). Note that community property laws do not apply in determining the compensation on wh......