Bohanan v. State of Nebraska
Decision Date | 19 April 1886 |
Citation | 30 L.Ed. 71,6 S.Ct. 1049,118 U.S. 231 |
Parties | BOHANAN v. STATE OF NEBRASKA. 1 Filed |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
[Statement of Case from pages 231-233 intentionally omitted] Wm. Leese, Atty. Gen. Neb., for the motion.
Chas. O. Whedon, in opposition.
This motion is denied. Bohanan set up specially an immunity from a second trial for the same offense, by reason of article 5 of the amendments of the constitution of the United States. This was denied him by the judgment of the supreme court of the state, and we have jurisdiction to review that decision. Upon a motion to dismiss we cannot consider the merits of the question on which our jurisdiction depends, and no motion has been made to affirm.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Liddy
...... 12 . This analysis of Lange prompted the court in Benz to state: . The Lange Case and the Basset Case, supra, (Basset v. United States, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 38) ... Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 366, 90 S.Ct. 498, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970); Bohanan v. Nebraska, 125 U.S. 692, 8 S.Ct. 1390, 30 L.Ed. 71 (1887); Smith v. United States, 94 U.S. 97, 24 ......
-
In re Grice
...... the petitioner, Wm. Grice, is a resident of the city and. county of Dallas, state of Texas; that he is a citizen of the. United States, and is unlawfully restrained of his liberty ......
-
James Keerl v. State of Montana
...the writ of error cannot be questioned. Boston Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25-30, 24 L. ed. 989-991; Bohanan v. Nebraska, 118 U. S. 231, 30 L. ed. 71, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1049; Boyd v. Nebraska, 143 U. S. 135-161, 36 L. ed. 103-109, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. On the merits, there is little room f......