Boileau v. De Cecco
| Decision Date | 10 June 1974 |
| Citation | 323 A.2d 449,65 N.J. 234 |
| Parties | Donna BOILEAU et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Louis De CECCO and Marion De Cecco, jointly, severally and in the alternative, Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Arthur Montano, Camden, for defendants-appellants (Kisselman, Deighan, Montano & Summers, Camden, attorneys; Gary L. Jakob, Camden, on the brief).
Leonard W. Moss, Runnemede, for plaintiff-respondent (Moss, Thatcher & Moss, Runnemede, attorneys).
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 125 N.J.Super. 263, 310 A.2d 497.
For affirmance:
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
30 cases
-
Ornelas v. Randolph, No. S027366
...only to undeveloped rural or semirural land. (Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co. (1979) 80 N.J. 391, 403 A.2d 910; Boileau v. DeCecco (1974) 65 N.J. 234, 323 A.2d 449.) The New Jersey court emphasized, however, that its immunity provision was based on a predecessor statute expressly limited to......
-
Mey v. Mey
... ... Germann v. Matriss, 55 N.J. 193, 220, 260 A.2d 825 (1970); Boileau v. De Cecco, 125 N.J.Super. 263, 267, 310 A.2d 497 (App.Div.1973), aff'd 65 N.J. 234, 323 A.2d 449 (1974). Furthermore, referential and qualifying ... ...
- Sallee v. Stewart
-
Monteville v. Terrebonne Parish Consol. Government
... ... See, e.g., Boileau v. DeCecco, 125 N.J.Super. 263, 310 A.2d 497 (1973), aff'd per curiam, 65 N.J. 234, 323 A.2d 449 (1974); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 80 N.J ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results