Bolden v. State, 88-1413

Citation14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231,543 So.2d 423
Decision Date18 May 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-1413,88-1413
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231 Lorenzo BOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Colin Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

COBB, Judge.

Bolden was charged with and convicted of battery on a law enforcement officer. The state introduced evidence at trial, over defense objection, that he battered another officer a year before. The purpose of the evidence obviously was to show propensity, contrary to the provisions of section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1987) and Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959).

The trial court stated that the testimony was admitted to establish identity or the absence of mistake or accident. These were not material issues at trial. On appeal, the state argues that the testimony was admissible to show a "pattern of conduct" by Bolden. That is exactly why the evidence was inadmissible. Reversal is required pursuant to Straight v. State, 397 So.2d 903, 908 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1022, 102 S.Ct. 556, 70 L.Ed.2d 418 (1981).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

DANIEL and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Moss v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 1 July 2015
    ...or admissibility of collateral crime evidence. Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 404.9 (2013 ed.); see Bolden v. State, 543 So.2d 423, 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (emphasizing that evidence should not be admitted merely to show a pattern of conduct). Likewise, lack of similarity in itself......
  • Bozeman v. State, 96-0822
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 3 September 1997
    ...other inmates and staff." Such testimony is inadmissible. See Broderick v. State, 564 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Bolden v. State, 543 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Smart v. State, 596 So.2d 786 (Fla. 3d DCA Additionally, Wimberly's portrayal of the unit's inmates is legally problematic......
  • Jackson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 10 June 2014
    ...of domestic violence did nothing more than demonstrate appellant's propensity for violence against his girlfriend”); Bolden v. State, 543 So.2d 423, 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (reversing admission of collateral-crime evidence offered to show a “pattern of conduct” by the defendant because its ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT