Bolen Bros. v. Miller
| Decision Date | 14 June 1928 |
| Docket Number | 1 Div. 507 |
| Citation | 218 Ala. 12,117 So. 462 |
| Parties | BOLEN BROS. v. MILLER. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Petition of E.J. Bolen and another, doing business as Bolen Bros., for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Bolen Bros. v. Miller, 116 So. 508. Writ denied.
Joe M. Pelham, Jr., of Chatom, for appellant.
Vernol R. Jansen, of Mobile, for appellee.
The argument for error in the opinion of the Court of Appeals rests, not upon alleged error of law in that opinion, but upon the proposition that the Court of Appeals has not correctly adjudged the effect of the evidence and the facts shown thereby. It is the settled law here that this court will not review the decisions of the Court of Appeals on any question of fact, but only questions of law. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91, which has been frequently followed.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Terry v. State
...412, 129 So. 291; Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Dees, 220 Ala. 604, 126 So. 621; Wood v. Hacker, 219 Ala. 139, 121 So. 441; Bolen Bros. v. Miller, 218 Ala. 12, 117 So. 462; Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902; parte Steverson, 211 Ala. 597, 100 So. 912. We will add, however, that the r......
-
Bishop v. State, 7 Div. 160.
... ... shot, he had the right to shoot." ... Miller ... & Miller, of Gadsden, for petitioner ... Thos ... E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for ... v. Dees, 220 Ala. 604, 126 So. 621; Wood ... v. Hacker, 219 Ala. 139, 121 So. 441; Bolen Bros. v ... Miller, 218 Ala. 12, 117 So. 462; Campbell v ... State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902; ... ...
-
Jeter v. State
... ... Cochran, ... 134 Ga. 396, 67 S.E. 825, 20 Ann.Cas. 219; State ex rel ... Denson v. Miller, 204 Ala. 234, 85 So. 700; State ex ... rel. Wert v. Florida Coast & Canal Co., 73 Fla. 1006, 75 ... ...