Bolton v. Ziegler
Decision Date | 31 March 1953 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 438 and 439. |
Citation | 111 F. Supp. 516 |
Parties | BOLTON v. ZIEGLER (two cases). |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
William M. Dallas and David H. Foster, of Donnelly, Lynch, Lynch & Dallas, all of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for the plaintiffs.
Harry Wilmarth and Ralph W. Gearhart, of Elliott, Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, all of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for the defendant.
On October 6th, 1951, on United States Highway No. 30 in Cedar County, Iowa, in the country, a collision occurred between an automobile owned by E. W. Bolton and an automobile owned and operated by Pearl Ziegler and another collision occurred between the Bolton automobile and a semi-trailer truck owned by the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company. The collisions occurred in quick succession. The parties are in dispute as to which collision occurred first. The Bolton automobile at the time was being driven by Fannie Bolton, the wife of E. W. Bolton. The plaintiff, E. W. Bolton, was riding in the automobile as a passenger at the time. Immediately preceding the collisions the Bolton automobile and the Ziegler automobile were proceeding westerly on the highway with the Bolton automobile in advance of the Ziegler automobile and two semi-trailer trucks were proceeding easterly on the highway. The second of the trucks was owned by the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company and was being operated by its employee, Joseph DeMoura. E. W. Bolton and Fannie Bolton sustained serious personal injuries as a result of the collisions. E. W. Bolton and Fannie Bolton are citizens of the State of Iowa. Pearl Ziegler is a citizen of the State of Illinois. In September, 1952, E. W. Bolton and Fannie Bolton brought the present actions against Pearl Ziegler in the District Court of Iowa in and for Cedar County. Service of original notice in the two cases was made upon Pearl Ziegler under the provisions of the Iowa Non-Resident Motorists Service Act. Sections 321.498 et seq., Code of Iowa 1950, I.C.A. The defendant, Pearl Ziegler, removed the two cases to this court on the ground of diversity of citizenship. In Case No. 438 the plaintiff, E. W. Bolton, asks damages in the amount of $35,000 and in Case No. 439 Fannie Bolton asks damages in the amount of $20,316.51 for the personal injuries sustained by them. The plaintiff in each case charges the defendant Ziegler with non-observance of the law of Iowa relating to the use of the highways.
The liability insurer of the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company was the Underwriters at Lloyds. On July 2d, 1952, E. W. Bolton executed the following document:
------------------- /s/ E. W. Bolton ------------------- "Witness /s/ William M. Dallas"
On July 2d, 1952, Fannie Bolton executed a document which was substantially similar. E. W. Bolton received the sum of $9,000 and Fannie Bolton received the sum of $3,000 as specified in the respective instruments.
The parties by pre-trial motions have presented and submitted to the Court the matters hereinafter referred to. In her answer in both cases the defendant, Pearl Ziegler, claims that she was not guilty of any negligence and that the collisions were occasioned solely by the negligence of the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company in failing to observe the law of Iowa relating to the use of the highways. It is indicated that the defendant, Pearl Ziegler, has brought on action against the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company in state court for damages claimed to have been sustained by her as a result of the mishap in question, which is still pending. It is the claim of the defendant Ziegler that if she was a tort-feasor then she and the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company were joint tort-feasors as to the plaintiffs and as to each other. It is also her claim that the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company and its liability insurer by means of the documents entitled "Loan Receipt and Covenant Not to Sue" are attempting to secure "contribution or indemnity" from her "contrary to the public policy and law of Iowa." She also makes a number of allegations, some of which are in the alternative. She alleges that the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company and its insurer are indispensable or necessary parties to these actions and moves that they be joined as parties or in the alternative that the actions be dismissed. She further alleges that the Denver-Chicago Trucking Company and its liability insurer are the real parties in interest and moves that they be made parties plaintiff, or in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Otis
... ... Klukas v. Yount, supra, has been cited with approval in Bolton v. Ziegler, 111 F.Supp. 516 (N.D. Iowa 1953); Gould v. Weibel, Fla., 62 So.2d 47 (1952) and Crocker v. New England Power Co., 348 Mass. 159, 202 ... ...
-
Breen v. Peck
... ... See Bolton v. Ziegler, 111 F.Supp. 516 (D.C.N.D.Iowa 1953); Rector v. Warner Bros. Pictures, 102 F.Supp. 263 ... Page 360 ... (D.C.S.D.Cal.1952); Black v ... ...
-
Chicago & North Western Ry. Co. v. Chicago, RI & PR Co.
... ... See Ford Motor Company v. Mondragon, 8 Cir., 1959, 271 F.2d 342; American District Telegraph Co. v. Kittleson, 8 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 946; Bolton v. Ziegler, D.C. N.D.Iowa 1953, 111 F.Supp. 516, 521-523; Denver-Chicago Trucking Co. v. Lindeman, D.C.N.D.Iowa 1947, 73 F. Supp. 925, 933; City of ... ...
-
Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior Court
... ... (See Luckenbach v. W.J. McCahan Sugar Ref. Co. (1918) 248 U.S. 139, 39 S.Ct. 53, 63 L.Ed. 170; see also Bolton v. Ziegler (N.D.Iowa 1953) 111 F.Supp. 516, 527.) ... 10. The titles of many of the law review articles make this quite clear. (See, e.g., ... ...