Bomar v. Wetzel
Docket Number | Civil Action 04-1730 |
Decision Date | 05 April 2024 |
Parties | ARTHUR BOMAR v. JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE
CORRECTEDMEMORANDUM[*]
In October 1998, after a jury trial in the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, PetitionerArthur Bomar was convicted of the kidnapping, rape, and murder of Aimee Willard and was sentenced to death.After exhausting his appeals and state post-conviction remedies, Bomar filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction and death sentence.He asserts nine claims for relief.For the reasons set forth below, the petition will be denied.
The facts underlying Bomar's conviction, as summarized by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on direct appeal, Commonwealth v. Bomar, 826 A.2d 831(Pa.2003)(Bomar I) and on appeal from the denial of his petition for collateral relief under Pennsylvania's Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. §§ 9541 et seq.Commonwealth v. Bomar, 104 A.3d 1179(Pa.2014)(Bomar II), are as follows:
Bomar I, 826 A.2d at 840-42.In addition, “Quincy Jamal Williams, another inmate incarcerated with [Petitioner] in Montgomery County, also reported to police that [Petitioner] confessed to murdering the victim.”Bomar II, 104 A.3d at 1186.
On December 10, 1997, Delaware County, Pennsylvania, authorities charged Bomar by criminal complaint with kidnapping, raping and murdering Aimee Willard and abusing her corpse.SeeResp'ts' Ex. C, ECFNo. 47-7.A few weeks later, upon learning that Bomar had reportedly attempted suicide in prison, defense counsel, Mark P. Much, Esquire,[3] requested a competency examination.Resp'ts' Ex. E, ECFNo. 47-7.After a hearing on the motion, the court[4] granted counsel's request and appointed Robert L. Sadoff, M.D., a psychiatrist, to conduct an examination of Bomar to determine his competency to stand trial.[5]Resp'ts' Exs. F, G, ECFNo. 47-9.Dr. Sadoff performed the examination on January 10, 1998, and issued a report two days later, on January 12, 1998, concluding that Bomar was competent.Sadoff Report, Jan. 12, 1998.The parties then appeared in court for a competency hearing on January 16, 1998.At the outset of the hearing, Bomar's counsel advised the court that the defense “d[id] not have a substantial objection to the conclusions reached by Dr. Sadoff,” was not requesting funds for a defense competency expert, and was waiving Dr. Sadoff's presence at the hearing and the right to cross-examine him. ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
