Bond v. Riley
Decision Date | 25 June 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 25578.,25578. |
Citation | 296 S.W. 401 |
Parties | BOND v. MILEY at al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Ozark County; Fred Stewart, Judge.
Suit to construe a will by William H. Bond against Josephine Riley and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
S. W. James and Mark A. McGruder, both of Sedalia, and M. E. Morrow and William D. Roberts, both of West Plains, for appellant.
Will H. D. Green and R. S. Hogan, both of West Plains, for respondents.
Suit in equity, brought in the circuit court of Howell county by plaintiff, William H. Bond, who is a grandson of Newton Bond, deceased, asking a construction of the will of Newton Bond, which was duly probated in the probate court of Howell county on July 3, 1922. The suit was transferred to the circuit court of Ozark county upon change of venue. Omitting the formal parts of the will, the several paragraphs or clauses thereof are as follows:
Plaintiff is a son of John C. Bond, who is named in paragraph "Fourth" of the will. John C. Bond was a son of the testator by a first marriage and predeceased his father, Newton Bond, the testator, prior to the making of the will, leaving a widow and five children, including plaintiff, surviving. All of said five children of John C. Bond survived the testator, Newton Bond, their grandfather. The testator had another son by his first marriage named William N. Bond, who also predeceased the testator, prior to the making of said will. William N. Bond was survived by a son, Boyd C. Bond, who, of course, is a grandson of testator. The record herein shows that the testator had only one grandson bearing the Christian name "William," such grandson being the plaintiff herein, William H. Bond. Paragraph "Fifth (2)" of the will describes the beneficiary of the devise made in said paragraph as "my grandson, William N. Bond." The testator had no grandson bearing the Christian name "William" and the middle initial "N." The grandson, Boyd C. Bond, son of William N. Bond, is not named or provided for in the will of Newton Bond as written and probated, nor is his father, William N. Bond, son of the testator, named or mentioned therein as being the testator's son. The testator also left surviving him a minor son by a second marriage, named William Bond, who is named and provided for in paragraphs "Fifth (1)" and "Eighth" of the will.
Pursuant to the directions of the will, the probate court appointed W. W. Toler as executor of the estate of Newton Bond, but he subsequently resigned his office and an administrator of the estate with the will annexed was appointed in his stead by the probate court. The defendants herein are, respectively, the several beneficiaries named in the will of Newton Bond, the administrator of his estate, and the heirs at law of Newton Bond, the testator. The petition alleges that there are conflicting claims to the estate of said Newton Bond under the provisions of the will, and that the administrator of testator's estate and the parties to the suit are in doubt as to the meaning and terms of the will, wherefore the court is asked to enter a decree construing said will and determining the rights and duties of the parties thereunder.
The testimony discloses that the two sons of testator, namely, John C. Bond, father of plaintiff, and William N. Bond, father of Boyd C. Bond, died several years before the testator made his will. The testator's place of residence, for many years prior to his death, was the city of West Plains. Plaintiff left West Plains, the place of residence of his grandfather, the testator, when he was a young child about 11 years of age, and about 14 years prior to the making of the will. The record shows that plaintiff, after leaving West Plains, had never returned to see or visit his grandfather, and had never at any time in his life made his home with the testator. There was some testimony, apparently offered by plaintiff for the purpose of showing testator's especial interest in and affection for plaintiff, to the effect that, while plaintiff was a very young lad, his grandfather had made him some presents of small pecuniary value, consisting of toys, knives, shoes, etc., but that the grandfather had bestowed no similar gifts upon plaintiff's two brothers and two sisters. Plaintiff, in explaining the good feeling and affectionate relation which existed during plaintiff's early boyhood between him and the testator, testified:
R. S. Hogan, the scrivener who wrote the will and one of the attesting witnesses to its execution, was permitted to testify, over the objections of plaintiff, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial