Bone v. United States, No. 716
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; CLARK |
| Citation | 374 U.S. 503,83 S.Ct. 1879,10 L.Ed.2d 1045 |
| Parties | Robert Louis BONE v. UNITED STATES. isc |
| Decision Date | 17 June 1963 |
| Docket Number | M,No. 716 |
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of the United States
Robert Louis Bone, pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068.
Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice HARLAN would deny certiorari on the basis of their dissent in Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1081.
To continue reading
Request your trial
55 practice notes
-
Lorenzana v. Superior Court
...of privacy.' Berutko, inter alia, quoted the following language from State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 181 A.2d 761 (cert. den. 374 U.S. 835, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1055), "Peering through a window or a crack in a door or a keyhole is not, in the abstract, genteel behavior, but the Fourt......
-
Bambu Sales, Inc. v. Gibson, Civ. No. 79-2195.
...see State v. Schrier, 30 N.J. 241, 152 A.2d 578 (1959), and State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 181 A.2d 761 (1962), cert. den. 374 U.S. 835, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1055. This Act was last amended by N.J. P.L. 1975, c. 98, largely to substitute the phrase "controlled dangerous substance&qu......
-
State v. Henry
...of the peace was committed in their presence. See State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 494, 181 A.2d 761 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 835, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1963). Under the common law, peace officers also had the authority to arrest without a warrant if they had probable cause to b......
-
State v. Novembrino
...Court first applied the exclusionary rule on June 4, 1962 in State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 181 A.2d 761 (1962), cert. den 374 U.S. 835, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1963). In the years following Smith, our Supreme Court has not only applied the exclusionary rule to Fourth Amendment violat......
Request a trial to view additional results
55 cases
-
Lorenzana v. Superior Court
...of privacy.' Berutko, inter alia, quoted the following language from State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 181 A.2d 761 (cert. den. 374 U.S. 835, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1055), "Peering through a window or a crack in a door or a keyhole is not, in the abstract, genteel behavior, but the Fourth Ame......
-
Bambu Sales, Inc. v. Gibson, Civ. No. 79-2195.
...see State v. Schrier, 30 N.J. 241, 152 A.2d 578 (1959), and State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 181 A.2d 761 (1962), cert. den. 374 U.S. 835, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1055. This Act was last amended by N.J. P.L. 1975, c. 98, largely to substitute the phrase "controlled dangerous substance" for th......
-
State v. Henry
...of the peace was committed in their presence. See State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 494, 181 A.2d 761 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 835, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1963). Under the common law, peace officers also had the authority to arrest without a warrant if they had probable cause to b......
-
State v. Novembrino
...Court first applied the exclusionary rule on June 4, 1962 in State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 181 A.2d 761 (1962), cert. den 374 U.S. 835, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1963). In the years following Smith, our Supreme Court has not only applied the exclusionary rule to Fourth Amendment violat......
Request a trial to view additional results