Boone v. William W. Backus Hospital

Decision Date05 September 2007
Citation284 Conn. 906,931 A.2d 261
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesAnthony D. BOONE, Administrator (Estate of Kyle Kalik Boone), et al. v. WILLIAM W. BACKUS HOSPITAL.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 102 Conn.App. 305, 925 A.2d 432(2007), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Larmel v. Metro N. Commuter R.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • November 15, 2021
    ...of plaintiff's claims had already been decided "through the [trial] court's rendering of summary judgment"), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 906, 931 A.2d 261 (2007) ; see also Hughes v. Bemer , 206 Conn. 491, 492–93, 538 A.2d 703 (1988) (trial court's judgment in favor of defendant resulting from ......
  • Larmel v. Metro N. Commuter R.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • October 6, 2020
    ...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Boone v. William W. Backus Hospital , 102 Conn. App. 305, 313, 925 A.2d 432, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 906, 931 A.2d 261 (2007).To summarize, the rationale underlying our Supreme Court's decision in Nunno relied in significant part on the purpose of the off......
  • Hall v. Gulaid
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 31, 2016
    ...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Boone v. William W. Backus Hospital, 102 Conn. App. 305, 311, 925 A.2d 432, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 906, 931 A.2d 261 (2007). Moreover, "[t]he appropriate inquiry with respect to [claim] preclusion is whether the party had an adequate opportunity to litig......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT