Boone v. William W. Backus Hospital
Decision Date | 05 September 2007 |
Citation | 284 Conn. 906,931 A.2d 261 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | Anthony D. BOONE, Administrator (Estate of Kyle Kalik Boone), et al. v. WILLIAM W. BACKUS HOSPITAL. |
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 102 Conn.App. 305, 925 A.2d 432(2007), is denied.
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Larmel v. Metro N. Commuter R.R. Co.
...of plaintiff's claims had already been decided "through the [trial] court's rendering of summary judgment"), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 906, 931 A.2d 261 (2007) ; see also Hughes v. Bemer , 206 Conn. 491, 492–93, 538 A.2d 703 (1988) (trial court's judgment in favor of defendant resulting from ......
-
Larmel v. Metro N. Commuter R.R. Co.
...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Boone v. William W. Backus Hospital , 102 Conn. App. 305, 313, 925 A.2d 432, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 906, 931 A.2d 261 (2007).To summarize, the rationale underlying our Supreme Court's decision in Nunno relied in significant part on the purpose of the off......
-
Hall v. Gulaid
...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Boone v. William W. Backus Hospital, 102 Conn. App. 305, 311, 925 A.2d 432, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 906, 931 A.2d 261 (2007). Moreover, "[t]he appropriate inquiry with respect to [claim] preclusion is whether the party had an adequate opportunity to litig......