Booth v. Board of Adjustment of Rockaway Tp.
| Decision Date | 06 November 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. A--7,A--7 |
| Citation | 234 A.2d 681,50 N.J. 302 |
| Parties | Bronson A. BOOTH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY, The Township of Rockaway, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendants, and Shahmoon Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Bronson A. BOOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY, The Township of Rockaway, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, and Shahmoon Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Defendants- Respondents. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Morris M. Schnitzer, Newark, for plaintiff-appellant-respondent, Bronson A. Booth (Waldron Kraemer, Newark, on the brief, Morris M. Schnitzer, Newark, of counsel, Kasen, Schnitzer & Kraemer, Newark, attorneys).
Paul R. Nusbaum, Succasunna, for defendant-appellant, Shahmoon Industries, Inc.
George H. Harbaugh, Morristown, for defendants-respondents, Board of Adjustment of The Township of Rockaway and The Township of Rockaway.
The opinion of the court was delivered
This appeal involves a municipal permission granted Shahmoon Industries, Inc. (Shahmoon) to build and operate a bituminous concrete (blacktop) plant on its property.
Shahmoon conducts various mining and quarrying operations on a 22-acre portion of a 2,200-acre tract which it owns in Rockaway Township. The balance of the 2,200 acres remains in its natural state, although the entire tract is zoned for mining and quarrying as well as residential use. In February 1964 Shahmoon sought permission to add the blacktop plant, approximately 75 100 , to the existing complex, which included a ready-mix concrete plant, a concrete blocking plant, and a heavy media plant.
Defendant, Board of Adjustment of Rockaway Township, initially found that the blacktop operation was an accessory use to Shahmoon's mining and quarrying operations and directed issuance of a building permit. This determination was made on March 25, 1964. Thereafter, the plant was completed by Shahmoon in June 1964.
Plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of Rockaway Township, sought to reverse the determination by an action in lieu of prerogative writs filed on May 14, 1964. The trial court determined that the use was not an accessory one to the mining and quarrying operations conducted by Shahmoon and invalidated the building permit. Shahmoon appealed. Pending the appeal the trial court stayed the judgment so that Shahmoon could continue its operation of the plant.
The Appellate Division affirmed on February 28, 1966 and, thereafter, we granted certification to Shahmoon on its petition. 47 N.J. 242, 220 A.2d 114 (1966).
While that appeal was pending, Shahmoon filed a variance application with the Board of Adjustment, which took testimony and thereafter recommended to the Township Committee that Shahmoon's application be granted. On September 14, 1965 the governing body granted the variance.
Plaintiff filed another action in lieu of prerogative writs challenging the grant of the variance. The trial court upheld the grant of the variance by the municipal bodies, finding that a blacktop plant would tend to promote the general welfare of the community and that special reasons existed for the granting of the variance. It found against Shahmoon on its request for determinations that plaintiff had no standing to sue, and that 'a hardship variance' had been proved by Shahmoon.
Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal in the Appellate Division, and then moved for certification before argument. We granted permission to consolidate the two cases before us.
We find first that plaintiff, as a citizen and taxpayer of Rockaway Township, had standing to challenge the establishment of a blacktop plant in a mining district. In view of the prevalence of mining and quarrying operations in the Township, the contemplated blacktop use had a potential impact on the integrity of the zoning plan and the community welfare sufficient to permit the intervention of a citizen and taxpayer. Cf. Kozesnik v. Montgomery Twp., 24 N.J. 154, 177--178, 131 A.2d 1 (1957); Bergen County v. Port of N.Y....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hoboken Environment Committee, Inc. v. German Seaman's Mission of New York
...restrictive land use regulations), app. dism. 423 U.S. 808, 96 S.Ct. 18, 46 L.Ed.2d 28 (1975); Booth v. Rockaway Tp. Bd. of Adj., 50 N.J. 302, 305, 234 A.2d 681 (1967) (citizen and taxpayer had standing to challenge blacktop use under zoning ordinance); Cf. Long Branch Div. of United Civic ......
-
Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC v. Vill. Supermarkets, Inc.
...Mayfair Supermarkets, Inc.,269 N.J.Super. 224, 634 A.2d 1381, 1385 (N.J.Super.Ct. Law Div.1993)(citing Booth v. Bd. of Adjustment of Rockaway Twp.,50 N.J. 302, 234 A.2d 681, 682 (1967)). The Superior Court ultimately decided this issue against Village, but “[i]n light of the unsettled condi......
-
State v. P. T. & L. Const. Co., Inc.
...use to which the premises are put"? Honigfeld v. Byrnes, 14 N.J. 600, 606, 103 A.2d 598, 601 (1954); see Booth v. Bd. of Adjust. of Rockaway Twp., 50 N.J. 302, 234 A.2d 681 (1967); United Advertising Corp. v. Metuchen, 42 N.J. 1, 198 A.2d 447 (1964); Dolan v. DeCapua, 13 N.J.Super. 500, 80 ......
-
Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment for Chatham Tp.
...must recognize that the Legislature has vested discretion in the municipal agency to make that decision. Booth v. Bd. of Adj., Rockaway Tp., 50 N.J. 302, 306, 234 A.2d 681 (1967). Public bodies, such as the Zoning Board here, because of their peculiar knowledge of local conditions, must be ......