Booth v. Merriam

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Writing for the CourtKNOWLTON, J.
CitationBooth v. Merriam, 155 Mass. 521, 30 N. E. 85 (Mass. 1892)
Decision Date24 February 1892
PartiesBOOTH v. MERRIAM et al.
COUNSEL

E.J. Jenkins and W.B. Orcutt, for plaintiff.

L.M Child, for defendant.

OPINION

KNOWLTON J.

In an ordinary lease of a dwelling-house, there is no implied covenant that the premises are in good repair or fit for habitation. "The rule of caveat emptor applies; and it is for the lessee to make the examination necessary to determine whether the premises he hires are safe, and adapted to the purposes for which they are hired." Cowen v Sunderland, 145 Mass. 363, 14 N.E. 117; Stevens v Pierce, 151 Mass. 207, 23 N.E. 1006. If there is a concealed defect that renders the premises dangerous, which the tenant cannot discover by the exercise of reasonable diligence, of which the landlord has or ought to have knowledge, it is the landlord's duty to disclose it, and he is liable for an injury which results from his concealment of it. Cowen v. Sunderland, ubi supra; Minor v Sharon, 112 Mass. 477; Bowe v. Hunking, 135 Mass. 380; Martin v. Richards, 29 N.E. 591, (Mass., Jan., 1892.) The plaintiff contends that this case shows the existence of such a defect, and that it is like Cowen v. Sunderland, in which it appeared that there was a cess-pool covered with decayed boards and earth four to six inches deep, on which grass and weeds were growing, in a yard hired by the plaintiff, and that it had been repaired with old boards some time before, by the defendants' direction. The case at bar differs from that in important particulars. There was an iron cover set in a wooden frame which covered the cess-pool, and was level with the surface of the ground, thereby disclosing to everybody that there was a covered excavation there, designed for use. The accident happened solely because the frame was old and out of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • Wilcox v. Hines
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1898
    ...Minor v. Sharon, 112 Mass. 477; Butler v. Cushing, 48 Hun, 617, 2 N.Y.S. 39; Cutter v. Hamlen, 147 Mass. 471, 18 N.E. 397; Booth v. Merriam, 155 Mass. 521, 30 N.E. 85; Oxford v. Leathe, 165 Mass. 255, 43 N.E. Wilcox v. Zane, 167 Mass. 306, 45 N.E. 923; Lynch v. Swan, 167 Mass. 510, 46 N.E. ......
  • Meade v. Montrose
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1913
    ...46 Am. Rep. 471; Cowen v. Sunderland, 145 Mass. 363, 14 N. E. 117, 1 Am. St. Rep. 469; Minor v. Sharon, 112 Mass. 477; Booth v. Merriam, 155 Mass. 521, 30 N. E. 85; Kern v. Myll, 94 Mich. 477, 54 N. W. 176; Davis v. Smith, 26 R. I. 129, 58 Atl. 630, 66 L. R. A. 478, 106 Am. St. Rep. 691; An......
  • Hogsett v. Hanna.
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1936
    ...425, 95 S.E. 394, L.R.A.1918D, 161; Hines v. Willcox, 96 Tenn. 148, 33 S.W. 914, 34 L.R.A. 824, 832, 54 Am.St.Rep. 823; Booth v. Merriam, 155 Mass. 521, 30 N.E. 85; Bowe v. Hunking, 135 Mass. 380, 46 Am.Rep. 471. *** “As indicated by the foregoing excerpts, the evidence in the record, as an......
  • Fifty Assocs. v. Berger Dry Goods Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • June 1, 1931
    ...v. Hunking, 135 Mass. 380, 384, 385,46 Am. Rep. 471;Cowen v. Sunderland, 145 Mass. 363, 14 N. E. 117,1 Am. St. Rep. 469;Booth v. Merriam, 155 Mass. 521, 30 N. E. 85;Mansell v. Hands, 235 Mass. 253, 254, 255, 126 N. E. 391, 13 A. L. R. 835. The refusal of the judge, therefore, to make the ru......
  • Get Started for Free