Booth v. State, 15

Decision Date01 September 1997
Docket NumberNo. 15,15
Citation346 Md. 246,696 A.2d 440
PartiesJohn Marvin BOOTH, v. STATE of Maryland. ,
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Michael J. Gentile, Nevett Steele, Jr., Nevett Steele, Jr., P.A., Towson, for Appellant.

Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baltimore, for Appellee.

Submitted before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, RAKER and WILNER, JJ.

ORDER

The Court having considered the application for leave to appeal from the denial of a motion to reopen a petition for post conviction relief and the State's opposition thereto in the above captioned case, it is this 30th day of June, 1997.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the application be, and it is hereby, granted and the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City is summarily affirmed except with regard to the Brady material issue dealt with in Part III at pages 15-17 of Judge Friedman's opinion of April 22, 1997; with respect to the Brady material issue, the circuit court's denial of the motion to reopen the post conviction proceeding is vacated and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to consider that issue on its merits.

Chief Judge Bell concurs in granting the application and in vacating the circuit court's order with regard to the Brady material issue. He dissents, however, from the summary affirmance with regard to the other issues. As to them, he would set the case for briefing and argument before the Court.

Judges Eldridge, Rodowsky and Chasanow would deny the application for leave to appeal, but, since the majority has granted the application, they would summarily affirm with regard to all issues.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Booth-El v. Nuth, CIV.A. CCB-97-1252.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • April 20, 2001
    ...Brady material. On that claim it vacated her decision and remanded for consideration of the merits of the claim. Booth v. State, 346 Md. 246, 696 A.2d 440 (1997). An evidentiary hearing was held on the Brady issue on October 16, 1997. On January 20, 1998, Judge Friedman issued a memorandum ......
  • Allen v. Acting Warden of WCI
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • July 24, 2019
    ...post-conviction proceedings may be reopened in the interests of justice. See Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. Art., § 7-104; Booth v. State, 346 Md. 246, 247 (1997) (directing reopening of post-conviction proceedings to consider petitioner's Brady claim). If a defendant is denied relief on his po......
  • Hunt v. State, 18
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 1997
    ... ... Hunt, that the circuit court enter an order modifying [696 A.2d 440] the method of execution specified in the warrant of execution dated May 15, 1997, to reflect his election of lethal injection and the withdrawal of his election of lethal gas ...         The appellant thereafter ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT