Borski v. State, 24549
| Decision Date | 21 December 1949 |
| Docket Number | No. 24549,24549 |
| Citation | Borski v. State, 225 S.W.2d 180, 154 Tex.Crim. 84 (Tex. Crim. App. 1949) |
| Parties | BORSKI v. STATE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Leo Darley, Uvalde, for appellant.
George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of bigamy, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.
Appellant's first complaint relates to the court's action in declining to sustain his motion to quash the indictment. The first count of the indictment upon which the court submitted the case to the jury seems to have been drawn in the language of Art. 490, Vernon's Ann. P. C. Moreover this count is in conformity with Wilson's Texas Criminal Forms and is deemed sufficient to charge the offense. Consequently the conviction rests on the first count of the indictment which charged that on or about the 22nd day of November, 1948, he, the said Steve Borski, did in the State of Coahuila, in the Republic of Mexico, unlawfully marry Violet Tracy; that at said time the said Steve Borski had a former wife, to-wit: Merle Marjorie Goebels Borski, then and there living; that thereafter, on the 24th day of November, 1949, the said Steve Borski and the said Violet Tracy lived and cohabitated together as man and wife in Uvalde County, Texas.
Does the state's evidence support and sustain the allegations? We do not think so. The state offered no documentory evidence showing that a marriage was performed in Mexico. There is, however, a document in the Spanish language brought forward as an exhibit which is not accompanied by a translation thereof into the English language, nor is there any evidence to show what it purports to be, neither does it appear to have been properly authenticated as provided by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1741. Therefore, we cannot consider the same.
Violet Tracy, with whom the alleged bigamous marriage with appellant was charged to have been performed, testified, in substance, as follows: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Leal v. State
...593, 210 S.W.2d 574 (Tex.Crim.App.1948); TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 38.30 (Vernon Supp.1986); see also Borski v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 84, 225 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Crim.App.1949); Drozda v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 614, 218 S.W. 765 (Tex.Crim.App.1920) (court held documentary evidence in foreign lan......
-
Vaughn v. State, 58432
...apparently been abandoned in favor of the holdings in Grady v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 331, 200 S.W.2d 1017 (1947) and Borski v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 84, 225 S.W.2d 180 (1948). See Alobaidi v. State, 433 S.W.2d 440, 442-43 (Tex.Cr.App.1968). Under these circumstances, then, given Northern's ma......
-
Bass v. State
...followed the language of the statute, Art. 1427, supra. This is ordinarily sufficient. 30 Tex.Jur.2d 580, Sec. 27; Borski v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.App. 84, 225 S.W.2d 180; Campbell v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.App. 172, 297 S.W.2d 847. It also follows the form suggested in Willson's Criminal Forms, Sev......
-
Alobaidi v. State
...followed the opinion prepared by the same writer in Grady v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 331, 200 S.W.2d 1017, and in Borski v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 84, 225 S.W.2d 180, which are contrary to appellant's contention and sustain our conclusion that the information is not fatally We note in this conne......