Bostic v. Schaefer
| Docket Number | 14-1167,14-1169,14-1173 |
| Decision Date | 28 July 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
228 cases
-
Nelson v. Warner
...on these grounds, the Court declines to address whether Biafore and Harris have individual standing as voters. See Bostic v. Schaefer , 760 F.3d 352, 370 (4th Cir. 2014) ("[T]he presence of one party with standing is sufficient to satisfy Article III's case-or-controversy requirement.") (qu......
-
Casa De Md., Inc. v. Wolf
...standing or representational standing to challenge each rule change. See Casa de Maryland , 971 F.3d at 239-41 ; Bostic v. Schaefer , 760 F.3d 352, 370 (4th Cir. 2014) (citing Dep't of Commerce v. U.S. House of Representatives , 525 U.S. 316, 330, 119 S.Ct. 765, 142 L.Ed.2d 797 (1999) (hold......
-
Guilford Coll. v. McAleenan
...to the defendant's allegedly unlawful conduct and that is (3) likely to be redressed by the requested relief.’ " Bostic v. Schaefer , 760 F.3d 352, 370 (4th Cir. 2014) (quoting Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 590, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ). Where, as here, Plaintif......
-
Sarsour v. Trump
...standing for every claim, but a claim is justiciable if even only one Plaintiff has standing to raise it. Bostic v. Schaefer , 760 F.3d 352, 370–71 (4th Cir. 2014). Because of the nature of Plaintiffs' statutory and constitutional claims, their showing of standing may be based on subjective......
Get Started for Free
26 books & journal articles
-
Equal Protection
...and lesbians are no longer a ‘group or class of individuals normally subject to ‘rational basis’ review.’”). 274. See Bostic v. Shaefer, 760 F.3d 352, 384 (4th Cir. 2014) (holding same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional in violation of the Equal Protection Clause); Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d ......
-
Appendix 5: State Laws Relating to Marriage
...ban on same sex marriages unconstitutional. So, it is very likely that Maryland’s ban would be declared unconstitutional. See: Bostic v. Schaefer, 760 F.3d 352 (4 th Cir. 2014), cert. den. 135 S.Ct. 308, 190 L.Ed.2d 140 (2014). 15. Michigan’s ban on same sex marriages was declared unconstit......
-
THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF CHICKEN STEALING: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE PATH TO POLYGAMY.
...576 U.S. 644 (2015). (171) Id. at 675. (172) See, e.g., Kitchen v. Herbert, 755 F.3d 1193, 1229-30 (10th Cir. 2014); Bostic v. Schaefer, 760 F.3d 352, 367 (4th Cir. 2014); Latta v. Otter, 771 F.3d 456, 464-65 (9th Cir. 2014); Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d 648, 653, 672 (7th Cir. (173) DeBoer v.......
-
REPUGNANT PRECEDENTS AND THE COURT OF HISTORY.
...(S.D.N.Y. 1956) (describing fairness in criminal proceedings as "an attribute of ... our national character"). (106.) Bostic v. Schaefer, 760 F.3d 352, 384 (4th Cir. 2014) ("one of the cornerstones of our way of (107.) Uccello v. Laudenslayer, 118 Cal. Rptr. 741, 748 (Ct. App. 1975) ("an im......
Get Started for Free