Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc.

Decision Date09 October 1978
Docket NumberNo. 61921,61921
Citation363 So.2d 506
PartiesClifford BOSWELL v. ROY O. MARTIN LUMBER CO., INC.
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court

Roy B. Tuck, Jr., Leesville, for plaintiff-applicant.

Charles S. Weems, III, Gold, Little, Simon, Weems & Bruser, Alexandria, for defendant-respondent.

SANDERS, Chief Justice.

This litigation involves damages for timber trespass.

Boswell, the plaintiff, sold Martin Lumber Company all hardwood, cypress, and pine trees eight inches and larger in diameter on his fifty-acre tract. During the term of the timber deed, the defendant injected thousands of trees ranging from two to twenty-two inches in diameter with a herbicide, killing them. The plaintiff sued, alleging trespass and praying for damages for loss of timber, for destruction of usefulness of land as a wildlife habitat, and for humiliation, mental anguish, aggravation, and embarrassment.

The district court awarded the plaintiff $5,000 for general damages. In assessing this award, it considered "the amount of acres involved, the denuded condition of the land, the effect this situation has on a sole proprietor who is obviously over fifty years of age." The defendant appealed. The Court of Appeal reduced the award to $500, a "fair and adequate amount." La.App., 355 So.2d 33 (1978). We granted plaintiff's application to review this judgment. La., 357 So.2d 1154 (1978).

Louisiana Civil Code Article 1934(3) provides in pertinent part:

"In the assessment of damages . . . in cases of offenses, quasi offenses, and quasi contracts, much discretion must be left to the judge or jury . . . ."

In Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., La., 304 So.2d 351 (1974), we set forth the applicable principles as follows:

"The trier of fact is granted much discretion in the award of general damages, i. e., those which may not be fixed with any degree of pecuniary exactitude but which, instead, involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of gratification of intellectual or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or life-style which cannot really be measured definitively in terms of money. (Citations deleted.)

"Our jurisprudence has established certain principles of review of such awards by the appellate courts, in their performance of the fact-review function assigned to them by the Louisiana constitution. (La.Const. Art. 5, §§ 5, 10 (1974).) La.Const. Art. VII, Sections 10, 29 (1921, as amended in 1958). These principles, as extensively summarized recently in Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co., 296 So.2d 257 (La.1974), include:

"The appellate review of awards for general damages is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its great discretion. The adequacy or inadequacy of an award should be determined on the basis of the facts and circumstances peculiar to the case under review, having in regard also that the trier of fact has the advantage of seeing the witnesses and evaluating their testimony, including that of residual pain. The awards made in other cases provide no scale of uniformity; their use is limited to serving as an aid to determine, if the present award is greatly disproportionate to similar awards (if Truly similar), whether an issue of abuse of discretion may exist in the present case. In any event, an abuse of trial-court discretion must be clearly demonstrated by the record before an appellate court will tamper with an award of general damages."

See also Miller v. Thomas, 258 La. 285, 246 So.2d 16 (1971).

In the present case, without the consent or knowledge of the plaintiff, defendant's employees injected 6,220 trees with herbicide. 1 Those less than eight inches at the stump numbered approximately 5,000 and were not subject to the timber deed. Virtually all trees on plaintiff's land less than eight inches in diameter were killed. (Trees injected included white oak, red oak, black gum, sweet gum, maple,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
100 cases
  • McGee v. A C and S, Inc.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 10 Julio 2006
    ...in terms of money." Duncan v. Kansas City S. R.R., 00-0066, p. 13 (La.10/30/00), 773 So.2d 670, 682; Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc., 363 So.2d 506, 507 (La.1978); Anderson v. Welding Testing Lab., Inc., 304 So.2d 351, 352 Loss of enjoyment of life falls within the definition of g......
  • 25,922 La.App. 2 Cir. 11/28/94, Maynor v. Vosburg
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 28 Noviembre 1994
    ...enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyle that cannot be measured definitively in terms of money. Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc., 363 So.2d 506 (La.1978); Whitaker, supra; Beckham, Larry Maynor consulted several doctors and was treated conservatively without success for app......
  • 26,388 La.App. 2 Cir. 5/10/95, Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 10 Mayo 1995
    ...enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyle that cannot be measured definitively in terms of money. Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc., 363 So.2d 506 (La.1978); Beckham, The accident occurred around 11:00 p.m. on January 7, 1988. Because of weather conditions, Earl did not arrive......
  • Coleman v. Sears Home Improvement Prods., Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2537 SECTION: "G"(5)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • 21 Marzo 2017
    ...933 So. 2d at 773 (citing Duncan v. Kansas City S. R.R., 00-0066, (La. 10/30/00), 773 So. 2d 670, 682; Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc., 363 So.2d 506, 507 (La. 1978); Anderson v. Welding Testing Lab., Inc., 304 So.2d 351, 352 (La. 1974)). 185. Young v. Ford Motor Co., 595 So. 2d 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT