Botofan-Miller v. Miller
| Decision Date | 22 June 2020 |
| Docket Number | No. 19-1216.,19-1216. |
| Citation | 141 S.Ct. 134 (Mem),207 L.Ed.2d 1079 |
| Parties | Loredana Elizabeth BOTOFAN-MILLER, Petitioner, v. Brett Robert MILLER. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
In re Johnson
......at 9, 176 P.3d 388 ; see also, e.g. , Botofan-Miller and Miller , 365 Or. 504, 520, 446 P.3d 1280 (2019), cert. den. , ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 134, 207 L.Ed.2d 1079 (2020) (same); ......
-
State v. Mott
...... at 117. A. court may also abuse its discretion if its decision is. "clearly against all reason and evidence." Id.;. see Botofan-Miller and Miller, 365 Or. 504, 506, 446. P.3d 1280 (2019), cert den,___ US___, 141 S.Ct. 134. (2020) (explaining that appellate courts will uphold a ......
-
In re Marriage of Pardovich
...(Internal citation omitted.)). But see also Botofan-Miller and Miller, 365 Or. 504, 525, 446 P.3d 1280 (2019), cert den, ___ US ___, 141 S.Ct. 134 (2020) ("If defendant believed that further explanation than the trial court provided was necessary for meaningful appellate review, it was incu......
-
In re Marriage of Maxey
...... appellate review, it is "'incumbent on [the party]. to request it.'" Botofan-Miller and Miller,. 365 Or. 504, 525, 446 P.3d 1280 (2019), cert den,. ___ US___, 141 S.Ct. 134 (2020) ("Mother's. lawyer asked for a clarification of ......
Request a trial to view additional results