Botsford v. State

Decision Date13 March 1975
Citation293 Ala. 745,309 So.2d 844
PartiesIn re Bruce BOTSFORD, alias v. STATE. Ex parte Bruce Botsford, alias. SC 1133.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

John T. Crowder, Jr., Mobile, for petitioner.

MERRILL, Justice.

Petition of Bruce Botsford, alias for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Botsford v. State, 54 Ala.App. 482, 309 So.2d 835.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Whisenhant v. State, 1 Div. 333
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 23 Agosto 1988
    ......State, 50 Ala.App. 206, 278 So.2d 210 (1973); Turner v. State, 410 So.2d 458 (Ala.Cr.App.1981). This is generally the law because the trial court is in the best position to weigh the evidence and 'evaluate the prejudicial atmosphere' surrounding the accused's case. Botsford v. State, 54 Ala.App. 482, 309 So.2d 835, cert. denied, 293 Ala. 745, 309 So.2d 844 (1975); Burnett v. State, 350 So.2d 718 (Ala.Cr.App.1977)." .         Robinson v. State, 430 S.2d 883 (Ala.Cr.App.1983); Nelson v. State, 440 So.2d 1130 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 440 So.2d 1130 ......
  • Anderson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 3 Octubre 1978
    ......State, 52 Ala.App. 668, 296 So.2d 755, cert. quashed, 292 Ala. 732, 296 So.2d 764 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106, 95 S.Ct. 777, 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1975). Actual prejudice directed toward the accused resulting from the extensive publicity must be shown. Botsford v. State, 54 Ala.App. 482, 309 So.2d 835 (1974), cert. denied, 293 Ala. 745, 309 So.2d 844 (1975); Annotation, 33 A.L.R.3d 17 (1970).         On motion for a change of venue in a criminal case, the defendant has the burden of showing, to the reasonable satisfaction of the court, that a fair ......
  • Mayola v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 8 Marzo 1977
    ...... Without proof of prejudicial influence on the jury, this court will not hold the trial court in error for refusing or failing to grant a motion for a change of venue or continuance based on pretrial publicity. Botsford v. State, 4 Ala.App. 482, 309 So.2d 835, cert. denied, 293 Ala. 745, 309 So.2d 844 (1974); Mathis v. State, 52 Ala.App. 668, 296 So.2d 755, cert. quashed, 292 Ala. 732, 296 So.2d 764, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106, 95 S.Ct. 777, 42 L.Ed.2d 802, rehearing denied, 420 U.S. 967, 95 S.Ct. 1363, 43 ......
  • Moulds v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 28 Diciembre 1982
    ......State, 52 Ala.App. 668, 296 So.2d 755, cert. quashed, 292 Ala. 732, 296 So.2d 764 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106, 95 S.Ct. 777, 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1975). Actual prejudice directed toward the accused resulting from the extensive publicity must be shown. Botsford v. State, 54 Ala.App. 482, 309 So.2d 835 (1974), cert. denied, 293 Ala. 745, 309 So.2d 844 (1975); Annotation, 33 A.L.R.3d 17 (1970). "On motion for a change of venue in a criminal case, the defendant has the burden of showing, to the reasonable satisfaction of the court, that a fair and impartial ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT