Bourassa v. City of Keene, 5583
Decision Date | 06 October 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 5583,5583 |
Citation | 234 A.2d 112,108 N.H. 261 |
Parties | Kenneth A. BOURASSA v. CITY OF KEENE et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Arthur Olson, Jr., and Lewis A. McMahon, Keene, for plaintiff.
Howard B. Lane, Keene, for intervenors, Theodore J. Jette and Alice G. Jette.
Eric J. Kromphold, Jr., City Sol., for City of Keene, filed no brief.
The question raised in this case is whether a party can appeal the decision of a board of adjustment to the Superior Court without first applying for a rehearing before the board. RSA 31:74 in pertinent part reads as follows:
If RSA 31:74 stood alone it could be argued that the application for a rehearing was optional and permissive. But it does not. The succeeding section (RSA 31:75) provides in part that 'No appeal from any order or decision of the board of adjustment * * * shall be taken unless the appellant shall have made application for rehearing as herein provided. * * *' Furthermore the statute allowing an appeal is definitely tied in with the motion for rehearing.
The statutory scheme for zoning contemplates that the parties shall exhaust their administrative remedies prior to the court appeal. Annot. 136 A.L.R. 1378. See Bois v. City of Manchester, 104 N.H. 5, 177 A.2d 612; 2 Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice, s. 13-10 (3d ed. 1965). While there is no decision in this state that holds that the failure to apply for a rehearing prevents a valid appeal, that is the clear import of H.I.K. Corporation v. City of Manchester, 103 N.H. 378, 381, 172 A.2d 368.
It is contended that in this case a motion for rehearing would have been useless. Generally such motions do not result in change at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carter v. City of Nashua
...is to give it an opportunity to take remedial action. See Merriam v. Salem, 112 N.H. 267, 293 A.2d 596 (1972); Bourassa v. Keene, 108 N.H. 261, 234 A.2d 112 (1967). There is no specific statutory provision that any official determination made by vote at a meeting held in violation of RSA ch......
-
Hardiman v. Dover, No. 6306
...this issue in their petition for rehearing. RSA 31:74, 75; DiPietro v. Nashua, 109 N.H. 174, 246 A.2d 695 (1968); Bourassa v. Keene, 108 N.H. 261, 234 A.2d 112 (1967). In addition, plaintiffs did not raise the issue in their petition for appeal to the superior court, raised it only inconclu......
-
Metzger v. Town of Brentwood
...board of adjustment . . . shall be taken unless the appellant shall have made application for rehearing . . ..' Bourassa v. Keene, 108 N.H. 261, 262, 234 A.2d 112, 113 (1967). The master ruled, however that the plaintiffs did not have to comply with the statutory requirements since the issu......
-
V. S. H. Realty, Inc. v. City of Rochester, 78-083
...official in zoning matters fails to exhaust statutory remedies, a petition for injunctive relief will not lie. Bourassa v. City of Keene, 108 N.H. 261, 234 A.2d 112 (1967); Carrick v. Langtry, 99 N.H. 251, 108 A.2d 546 (1954). As we have stated before, this sound rule is based on the reason......