Bowers v. American Bridge Co, A--125
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) |
| Citation | 24 N.J. 390,132 A.2d 28 |
| Docket Number | No. A--125,A--125 |
| Parties | Robert BOWERS, Petitioner-Respondent, v. AMERICAN BRIDGE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant. |
| Decision Date | 03 June 1957 |
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 43 N.J.Super. 48, 127 A.2d 580.
Burtis W. Horner, Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Stryker, Tams & Horner, Newark, attorneys).
Harry Lane, Jr., Red Bank, argued the cause for respondent.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and WEINTRAUB--6.
For reversal: Justice HEHER--1.
To continue reading
Request your trial
25 practice notes
-
Nanavati v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hosp., s. 86-5778
...v. Roxbury Township, 2 N.J. Tax 206 (1981) (citing Bowers v. American Bridge Co., 43 N.J. Super. 48, 127 A.2d 580 (1956), aff'd, 24 N.J. 390, 132 A.2d 28 (1957) (applying Pennsylvania law)); see generally 18 C. Wright, A. Miller & E. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure Sec. 4470, at 687-......
-
Boyle v. G. & K. Trucking Co., A--69
...87 N.J.L. 688, 94 A. 309 (E. & A.1915); cf. Bowers v. American Bridge Co., 43 N.J.Super. 48, 60, 127 A.2d 580 (App.Div.1956), affirmed 24 N.J. 390, 132 A.2d 28 (1957); Buccheri v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 19 N.J. 594, 598, 118 A.2d 21 In Rogge, a workman was employed in New York to do work wh......
-
Posey v. Industrial Commission, 6660
...will result in a contract of employment. See Bowers v. American Bridge Co., 43 N.J.Super. 48, 127 A.2d 580, affirmed on opinion below, 24 N.J. 390, 132 A.2d 28 and Gomez v. Federal Stevedoring Co., 5 N.J.Super. 100, 68 A.2d 482, principally relied on by petitioner, where an intermediate app......
-
Wilson v. Faull, A--306
...Co., 19 N.J. Page 560 594, 118 A.2d 21 (1955), and Bowers v. American Bridge Co., 43 N.J.Super. 48, 127 A.2d 580 (App.Div.1956), affirmed 24 N.J. 390, 132 A.2d 28 (1957), although consideration of the relative interests of both states in the relationships and legal consequences involved wil......
Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
-
Nanavati v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hosp., s. 86-5778
...v. Roxbury Township, 2 N.J. Tax 206 (1981) (citing Bowers v. American Bridge Co., 43 N.J. Super. 48, 127 A.2d 580 (1956), aff'd, 24 N.J. 390, 132 A.2d 28 (1957) (applying Pennsylvania law)); see generally 18 C. Wright, A. Miller & E. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure Sec. 4470, at 687-......
-
Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Company, 79-116
......American Airlines, Inc. , 587 F.2d 627, 630 (1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 883, 100 .... ."); Cook v. Minneapolis Bridge Construction Co. , 231 Minn. 433, 43 N.W.2d 792 (1950) (prior North Dakota ...752, 146 So.2d 327 (1962) (prior Georgia award); Bowers v. American Bridge Co. , 43 N.J.Super. 48, 127 A.2d 580 (1956), aff'd, 24 ......
-
Boyle v. G. & K. Trucking Co., A--69
...... See American Radiator Co. v. Rogge, 86 N.J.L. 436, 92 A. 85, 94 A. 85 (Sup.Ct.1914), ...688, 94 A. 309 (E. & A.1915); cf. Bowers v. American Bridge Co., 43 N.J.Super. 48, 60, 127 A.2d 580 (App.Div.1956), ......
-
Posey v. Industrial Commission, 6660
...... See Bowers v. American Bridge Co., 43 N.J.Super. 48, 127 A.2d 580, affirmed on ......
Request a trial to view additional results