Bowman v. Richardson, 71147
| Decision Date | 18 November 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 71147,71147 |
| Citation | 338 S.E.2d 297,176 Ga.App. 864 |
| Parties | BOWMAN v. RICHARDSON et al. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
John S. Husser, for appellant.
R. Wayne Thorpe, Ronald L. Reid, Atlanta, for appellees.
The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants in this slip and fall case, and plaintiff Bowman appeals. Held:
We affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment to appellees Spurgeon Richardson and Six Flags Over Georgia, Inc. The evidence shows Bowman slipped while walking on a path at the appellee park. As soon as she entered the park she noticed sprinklers throwing water out onto the sidewalks and streets of the park. She fell about 9:15 p.m., when the park was well lit by lights. As she was walking down the path where she fell, she could see water running down the sides of the path. Ahead of her, a groundskeeper was picking up trash. She thought that he would step aside when he got to her, but when he did not, she stepped aside (the path was wide enough for a number of people to pass), and at that moment, slipped. She was unconscious for two or three minutes, but when she awoke, she realized she was wet. She testified she slipped on the slick manhole cover which was wet like the sidewalks. She noticed after or as she fell that the manhole cover was slick but otherwise it was like any other manhole cover she had ever seen. It was not covered up and there was nothing obstructing it. She hypothesizes it was the water on the manhole cover that caused her to fall.
The evidence shows appellant did not see the manhole cover until after she fell, but on appellee's motion for summary judgment, we will assume as fact that appellant slipped on the slick, wet manhole cover, as she testified. However, the evidence also shows beyond any genuine issue of material fact that appellant had equal knowledge of the water running over and around the path where she walked, and near the manhole cover, and that the manhole cover was not obstructed or hidden from view in any way. She may not have had actual knowledge of the slick manhole, but no reason or fact is shown as to why, in the exercise of ordinary care, she should not have seen it. By her assumption that she slipped on the wet manhole cover, Bowman concedes she was aware that a wet metal cover was slippery and presented a danger.
A proprietor has the duty to keep premises safe for invitees (OCGA § 51-3-1) but the plaintiff cannot recover if she has failed to exercise ordinary care for her own safety. OCGA § 51-11-7. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Atkinson v. Kirchoff Enterprises, Inc.
...objects and] slipping when walking thereon." Wade v. Roberts, 118 Ga.App. 284, 287, 163 S.E.2d 343 (1968). See Bowman v. Richardson, 176 Ga.App. 864, 865, 338 S.E.2d 297 (1985) (actual knowledge of risk posed by slippery manhole not necessary where plaintiff aware entire sidewalk was wet). ......
-
Pennington v. Cecil N. Brown Co., Inc., 76136
...her to fall. See Shackelford v. DeKalb Farmers' Market, 180 Ga.App. 348, 350(2), 349 S.E.2d 241 (1986). Compare Bowman v. Richardson, 176 Ga.App. 864, 338 S.E.2d 297 (1985); Anderson v. Dunwoody North, etc., Club, 176 Ga.App. 210, 335 S.E.2d 451 (1985); Purvis v. Holiday Hills, etc., Assn.,......
-
Little v. Alliance Fire Protection, Inc.
...but nevertheless chooses to traverse it. Bloch v. Herman's Sporting Goods, 208 Ga.App. 280, 430 S.E.2d 86 (1993); Bowman v. Richardson, 176 Ga.App. 864, 338 S.E.2d 297 (1985). In Bloch, the plaintiff drove to the defendant's store when the temperature in the area had been freezing for sever......
-
Metromedia Steakhouses Co., L.P. v. Ray
...' " Id. This common sense rule applies equally to exterior surfaces, whether they are flat or sloping. See Bowman v. Richardson, 176 Ga.App. 864, 338 S.E.2d 297 (1985) (requiring plaintiffs to show lack of knowledge of foreign substances "such as water on a ramp" to The majority opinion neg......