Boyd v. Boyd, 8230DC319
Decision Date | 15 March 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 8230DC319,8230DC319 |
Citation | 61 N.C.App. 334,300 S.E.2d 569 |
Parties | William P. BOYD, Jr. v. Margaret B. BOYD. |
Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
Russell L. McLean, III, Waynesville, for plaintiff-appellant.
Brown, Ward, Haynes & Griffin by H.S. Ward, Jr., Waynesville, for defendant-appellee.
G.S. 50-8 states in part: "In all actions for divorce the complaint shall be verified in accordance with the provisions of Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and G.S. 1-148." The defendant argues that this requirement was not satisfied when the plaintiff verified his complaint after it was filed but before it was served upon the defendant.
G.S. 1-148 requires verification before certain persons, e.g., a notary public, before it will be valid. This factor is not contested by the defendant.
Instead, the defendant contends that the verification requirements of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11 were not met. Although that rule does not state at what time a complaint must be verified, the defendant argues that it must be verified when the complaint is filed to be valid. She reaches this conclusion by reading G.S. 1A-1, Rule 3, which says that a civil action is not commenced until the complaint is filed, in conjunction with G.S. 50-8, which requires verification for a valid divorce complaint.
In interpreting paragraph one of G.S. 50-8, which contains the verification requirement, our Supreme Court stated: "[T]he allegations required by G.S. 50-8 are indispensable, constituent elements of a divorce action and must be established either by the verdict of a jury or by a judge, as the pertinent statute may permit." Eudy v. Eudy, 288 N.C. 71, 74, 215 S.E.2d 782, 785 (1975). Although Eudy did not involve verification, we find its rationale persuasive.
Other authorities support our holding. 1 R. Lee, N.C. Family Law § 50 (4th ed.1979). Verification of a divorce complaint is required in most jurisdictions and is mandatory for jurisdiction when so required. 24 Am.Jur.2d Divorce and Separation § 314 (1966).
We note the plaintiff's argument that because G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11 does not state a time period in which verification must occur that it is sufficient to obtain verification before the complaint and summons are served. But when G.S. 50-8 is read in conjunction with G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11 and G.S. 1A-1, Rule 3, this argument fails. Because a cause of action is not commenced until a valid complaint is filed and the complaint here was not valid because it did not meet the verification requirement, the court never obtained jurisdiction over the case.
As a result, we hold that G.S. 50-8 requires that for a complaint for divorce to be valid, it must be verified in accordance with G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11 when it is filed. It is not sufficient to obtain verification before the complaint and summons are served on...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re T.R.P.
...has been in litigation, we note that any party, including WCDSS, can file a new petition in this matter. Cf. Boyd v. Boyd, 61 N.C.App., 334, 336, 300 S.E.2d 569, 571 (1983) (affirming the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's divorce action because the complaint was not properly verifi......
-
Alford v. Shaw
...§ 1A-1, Rule 23(b) (1983) (requiring complaint initiating shareholder derivative action to be verified by oath); Boyd v. Boyd, 61 N.C.App. 334, 300 S.E.2d 569 (1983). Secondly and alternatively, defendants argue that if verification of a pleading is sufficient to vest subject matter jurisdi......
-
In re C.N.R.
...rights petition or motion occur contemporaneously with or subsequent to the signing of any such pleading. Cf. Boyd v. Boyd , 61 N.C. App. 334, 336, 300 S.E.2d 569 (1983) (requiring a complaint for divorce to be verified prior to filing).¶ 22 "[G]iven the magnitude of the interests at stake ......
-
Aslund v. Oslund
...of any order confirming registration must be attached to the petition." N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-308(a) ; see also Boyd v. Boyd , 61 N.C. App. 334, 336, 300 S.E.2d 569, 570 (1983) ("a verification is required as an essential part of the complaint.... The want of a proper verification is a fata......