Boyett v. Hahn

Decision Date16 November 1916
Docket Number6 Div. 318
CitationBoyett v. Hahn, 197 Ala. 439, 73 So. 79 (Ala. 1916)
PartiesBOYETT v. HAHN et al.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Chancery Court, Jefferson County; A.H. BennersChancellor.

Bill by Mrs. I.E. Boyett against William Hahn and others, to declare complainant the owner of one-half the capital stock of the Plainview Land Company, and for a sale of the assets of said company for a division.From a decree sustaining demurrercomplainant appeals.Transferred from Court of Appeals under Act of April 18, 1911, p. 449, § 6. Affirmed.

L.J Cox, of Birmingham, for appellant.

William M. Spencer, Jr., of Birmingham, for appellees.

THOMAS J.

When the contract of the parties provides no method of enforcing or foreclosing a lien, a court of equity in the exercise of its original jurisdiction may protect and foreclose such lien.1 Pom.Eq.Jur. §§ 165-167;Averyt Drug Co. v. Ely-Robertson-Barlow Drug Co.,69 So. 931.

Exhibit A is a mortgage on Hahn's stock or interest in the corporation.Campbell v. Woodstock I. Co.,83 Ala. 351, 3 So. 369;Gilmer v. Morris,80 Ala. 78, 60 Am.Rep. 85;Ellington v. Charleston,51 Ala. 166.

The complainant has the right, under the averments of her bill, to a foreclosure of her lien on the one-half interest in the Plainview Land Company"transferred, set over, and assigned to Mrs. I.E. Boyett as trustee," by William Hahn.It is averred that this land company is a corporation owned in equal parts by J. Standish Clark and William Hahn; and until the foreclosure by complainant of her lien on Hahn's interest and stock in the corporation, and her purchase of the same at such foreclosure, complainant has no right of participation in the governmental affairs of the corporation, to the exclusion of William Hahn.

If the prayer for relief, under the averments of the bill, were for a foreclosure of her lien on Hahn's interest or stock in the corporation, and not for a dissolution of the corporation and a sale of its assets for division, such relief might be had.

Complainant must first have a foreclosure of her lien, after which, if she becomes the purchaser of Hahn's interest, the right to a participation in the affairs of the corporation will be accorded to her as such purchaser.

It results that respondents' demurrerNo. 5 to the bill as originally filed (No. 7 to the bill as last amended) was properly sustained; and the decree of the chancellor is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

AN...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Manchuria S.S. Co. v. Harry G.G. Donald & Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 15, 1917
    ... ... thereby, a court of equity exercising original jurisdiction ... has power to protect and foreclose such lien. Boyett v ... Hahn et al., 73 So. 79 ... The ... future advances sought to be secured by the contract were ... specified with reasonable ... ...
  • Pavilion Development v. Jbj Partnership
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • August 10, 2007
    ...to sell any Gallop property (including its statutory right of redemption) without Pace's consent. JBJ cites two decisions—Boyett v. Hahn, 197 Ala. 439, 73 So. 79 (1916), and Selma Bridge Co. v. Harris, 132 Ala. 179, 31 So. 508 (1902)—as authority for this argument. In Boyett, Hahn, who owne......
  • Palmer v. James
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1924
    ...of the mule as "security" for its purchase price; that a written transfer of title was the subject of consideration in Boyett v. Hahn, 197 Ala. 439, 73 So. 79; v. Davis, 198 Ala. 81, 73 So. 419; and as security for debt in Ellington v. Charleston, 51 Ala. 166. In Wood v. Holly Mfg. Co., 100......
  • W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. Timmerman
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1920
    ... ... 530, specific execution of contract respecting land ... decree, no rights of third parties intervening; Oden v ... Vaughn, 85 So. 779; Boyett v. Hahn, 197 Ala. 439, ... 73 So. 79, no method being provided by contract for enforcement ... of lien, same was enforced in equity ... ...
  • Get Started for Free