Boykin v. State, 49A02-9303-CR-147
Decision Date | 28 October 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 49A02-9303-CR-147,49A02-9303-CR-147 |
Citation | 622 N.E.2d 568 |
Parties | Robert E. BOYKIN, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Robert E. Boykin, pro se.
Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Mary Dreyer, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee-plaintiff.
Appellant-defendant Robert E. Boykin appeals his resentencing after a previous decision on post-conviction proceedings. In a memorandum decision, 49A02-9203-PC-104, this Court determined that the post-conviction court properly denied Boykin's post-conviction petition. However, this Court also determined that Boykin was improperly sentenced on the habitual offender count. 597 N.E.2d 393. In remanding the cause for a corrected sentence, this Court stated:
The record does not reflect and Boykin does not indicate that he requested rehearing or transfer of the decision by this Court.
In this latest appeal, Boykin raises numerous errors. Because this appeal is from the resentencing, this Court is now confined to review of only the errors alleged to have occurred as a result of the resentencing. Boykin's other alleged errors will not be addressed here because they were previously determined, or were available for determination, in the post-conviction proceeding and the appeal related to that proceeding. Cf. McBride v. State (1992), Ind.App., 595 N.E.2d 260, 262 ( ).
Unfortunately, Boykin's main contention appears to be that the court below erroneously resentenced him pursuant to IND.CODE Sec. 35-50-2-8(e). The court merely complied with the decision of this Court on remand. Boykin failed to request rehearing or transfer of the previous decision by this Court. This failure precludes further consideration of the matter. See Pinkston v. State (1985), Ind.App., 479 N.E.2d 79, 81 (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cuto v. State
...so. Id. Failure to seek transfer from an adverse ruling will preclude later presentation of error on the same ground. Boykin v. State, 622 N.E.2d 568 (Ind.Ct.App.1993), trans. denied. The ruling becomes the law of the case. Id. Additionally, we look to Cuto's request for relief made to the ......
-
Riffe v. State, 92A03-9606-CR-197
...court's resentencing order. The trial court did not err in granting Riffe permission to file a belated praecipe. See Boykin v. State, 622 N.E.2d 568, 569 (Ind.Ct.App.1993), trans. denied (on an appeal from resentencing, this Court is confined to review only the errors alleged to have occurr......
-
Hendrix v. Page
... ... both in the Scott Circuit Court and in this court is tantamount to a request that Indiana state courts determine whether the automatic stay should have applied to their action against Hendrix and ... ...
-
Becker v. State, 49A02-9901-CR-35.
...to appeal from a resentencing order. See Riffe v. State, 675 N.E.2d 710, 711 n. 1 (Ind.Ct.App.1996), trans. denied; Boykin v. State, 622 N.E.2d 568, 569 (Ind. Ct.App.1993), trans. denied. Therefore, we will not dismiss this appeal for lack of II. LAW OF THE CASE & WAIVER The State argues th......