Boynton v. Lynn

Decision Date13 April 1914
PartiesBOYNTON v. LYNN.
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from District Court, Emmons County; Winchester, Judge.

Action by Carlos N. Boynton against George W. Lynn. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.Watson & Young, of Fargo (Durment, Moore & Oppenheimer and Ashley Coffman, all of St. Paul, Minn., of counsel), for appellant. R. N. Stevens, of Bismarck, Harry C. Lynn, of Linton, and Newton, Dullam & Young, of Bismarck, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are so similar to those in the case of Patterson Land Company v. Lynn, 147 N. W. 256, filed in this court on the 6th day of March, 1914, the only difference being in the description of the lands, that such decision governs herein.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Patterson Land Co. v. Lynn
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • July 28, 1924
    ...11, 1914. Per curiam decisions in Hoerr v. Lynn, 27 N. D. 449, 147 N. W. 263;Hackney v. Lynn, 27 N. D. 458, 147 N. W. 263;Boynton v. Lynn, 27 N. D. 457, 147 N. W. 263, all disposed of on the governing opinion in 27 N. D. 391, 147 N. W. 256, supra. In 1917 a motion was made by the defendant ......
  • Lenhart v. Lynn
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • September 10, 1923
    ...Lynn, 27 N. D. 391, 147 N. W. 256;Hackney v. Lynn, 27 N. D. 458, 147 N. W. 263;Hoerr v. Lynn, 27 N. D. 449, 147 N. W. 263;Boynton v. Lynn, 27 N. D. 457, 147 N. W. 263; the judgments of Patterson Land Co., of Hoerr, and of Boynton against the same defendant, all dated February 21, 1917, and ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT