Bozeman v. Cale

CourtSupreme Court of Indiana
Citation139 Ind. 187,35 N.E. 828
PartiesBOZEMAN et al. v. CALE et al.
Decision Date13 December 1893

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from superior court, Vanderburgh county; W. F. Parrett, Judge.

Action by James Cale and others against Virgil P. Bozeman and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Dismissed.

G. V. Menzies, Alexander Gilchrist, Curran A. De Bruler, and Elliott & Elliott, for appellants. J. E. McCullough, for appellees.

DAILEY, J.

This was an action brought by the appellee James Cale and 39 others named in the amended complaint against the appellant Bozeman, as contractor, and the auditor and treasurer of Posey county, to restrain the collection of certain assessments for the construction of a ditch under the drainage act of 1875. The suit was commenced in the Posey circuit court on the 21st day of May, 1886. A change of venue was afterwards taken to the Vanderburgh superior court, where, on November 25, 1890, the cause was submitted to the court for trial, and the court found and adjudged that the defendants (appellants herein) be perpetually enjoined from collecting any of said assessments. The appellants moved in arrest of judgment, and filed their motion and written reasons for a new trial, which motions were severally overruled, and they prosecute this appeal.

On March 1, 1893, James Cale, James G. Nesbit, and Joseph Cale, of appellees in this cause, moved the court to dismiss the appeal of the appellants herein, and specified several causes, among which are that the assignment of errors does not contain the names of the necessary parties; that the appeal herein was not taken within one year from the time the judgment from which it is prosecuted was rendered; that before the submission of this cause in this court, to wit, on the 29th day of January, 1892, the appellants herein filed their motion in this court to dismiss this appeal as to the appellees John Walker, James Redman, and Moses Yeager, which motion was on February 2, 1892, sustained by this court, and said appeal dismissed as to said appellees; that said appellees were parties plaintiff to the judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted, and necessary parties to this appeal, but neither they, nor any representative or substitute for them, were parties to this appeal at the time of the submission of this cause in this court, or at any time since; that Andrew J. Wasem, treasurer of Posey county, is a coparty of the appellants in the judgment from which this appeal is taken, and no notice has been served upon him, nor has he joined in this appeal, nor was this appeal taken at the time at which said judgment was rendered. An examination of the record discloses that, among the parties plaintiff to this judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted, are John C. Cox, Elizabeth Benson, Jesse Kimball, George Meadows, James T. Alcorn, George W. Johnson, Marvel Knowles, Thomas Brown, James Drake, Hannah Christy, and Charles Christy. They were all parties plaintiff in both paragraphs of the amended complaint. Their names are all set out in the title of both paragraphs, but are not named in the assignment of errors. The finding or decision of the court upon the issue tried was in favor of all of the plaintiffs. The final judgment is in favor of the plaintiffs, and all of them, without exception, and this is also true as to the judgment for costs.

We think we must look to the complaint in the cause, and the subsequent steps taken, as shown by the record, to ascertain who are the parties plaintiff in this action. An examination of the record does not disclose that any of the parties above named ceased to be parties to the action by dismissal or otherwise. The clerk's omission of the names of any of the plaintiffs from the title to the entry in the order book does not eliminate the parties whose names are left out, from the cause. On the contrary, upon appeal, in order to ascertain who are the parties to the judgment appealed from, the court will look through the record to the pleadings, and, if necessary, to the summons. Written dismissals were filed by several of the parties plaintiff in the lower court, and in this court the appeal was dismissed as to appellees John Walker, James Redman, and Moses Yeager, but none of the parties embraced in appellees' motion were affected by these judgments of dismissal. Appellants having failed to make said Cox, Benson, Kimball, Meadows, Alcorn, Johnson, Knowles, Brown, Drake, Christy, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT