Bracht v. Johnson
Decision Date | 15 February 1915 |
Docket Number | No. 11341.,11341. |
Citation | 187 Mo.App. 220,173 S.W. 692 |
Parties | BRACHT v. JOHNSON et al. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Gasconade County; R. A. Breuer, Judge.
Action by C. H. Bracht against Frank Johnson and another, begun in justice court, and appealed to circuit court. From a judgment there for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
J. H. Schaper, of Washington, Mo., and Robert Walker, of Hermann, for appellant. August Meyer, of Hermann, and J. W. Hensley, of Owensville, for respondents.
This action was begun before a justice of the peace by filing the following written statement:
Frank Johnson and Christ Johnson to C. H. Bracht, Dr.
For use and occupation of real estate of said C. H. Bracht for anchorage of cables and ferryboat on the west side of the Gasconade river, at Fredericksburg in Gasconade county, Missouri in operating ferry boat over and across said river at said place for ten years from May 26, 1903, to May 26, 1913 said use and occupation having been with the consent of said C. H. Bracht and for the benefit and profit of said Frank Johnson and Christ Johnson and being of the reasonable value of two hundred dollars................. $200 00
Plaintiff had judgment before the justice, and defendants appealed. At the close of the evidence for plaintiff the circuit court directed a verdict for defendants, and plaintiff has brought the case here.
It seems that the land was on the bank of the Gasconade river, and was owned by the "A. O. U. W.," and that lodge sold it to plaintiff. Before plaintiff's purchase defendant Frank Johnson obtained a license for a ferry and operated the ferryboat by means of an overhead wire or cable which he fastened to the "fork of a tree" on the bluff standing nearly 45 feet above the river at its usual stage. He tied the cable to the tree with the permission of the "A. O. U. W.," and that was the situation when plaintiff bought. Defendant Frank operated the ferry until his five-year license expired, in February, 1906. Then defendant Christ obtained a license and operated it until February, 1912. Then defendant Frank again obtained a license, and was operating it in May, 1913, when this action was begun. During all these years, at least up to about the time the suit was brought, no objection was made to this "anchorage," nothing was said about a contract, nor was there ever any mention of compensation. Undoubtedly there was a mere...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rupli v. South Mountain Heritage Soc'y, Inc.
... ... 885 (1910) (mere conveyance of the legal title to the servient tenement will not render the subsequent user ipso facto adverse); Bracht v. Johnson, 187 Mo.App. 220, 173 S.W. 692 (1915) (license to use land was held to continue where new owner made no objections to the use); Sturnick ... ...
-
Thompson v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.
... ... plaintiff, purported to act with authority from plaintiff. 2 ... C. J. 435, tit. Agency; Somerville v. Railroad, 62 ... Mo. 391; Johnson v. Hurley, 115 Mo.App. 513. (6) And ... because plaintiff under such circumstances was estopped from ... denying the authority of said Bailey. 2 C ... S.W. 337; State ex rel. v. Dickmann, 146 Mo.App ... 396, 124 S.W. 29; Haumueller v. Ackermann, 150 ... Mo.App. 141, 130 S.W. 91; Bracht" v. Johnson, 187 ... Mo.App. 220, 173 S.W. 692; [199 Mo.App. 364] 39 Cyc. 853; ... Young, et al. v. Home Telephone Co., 201 S.W. 635.] ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Thompson v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.
... ... Johnson Grain Co. v. Railroad, 177 Mo. App. 194, 164 S. W. 182 ... Pursuing the argument advanced by appellant's counsel in this connection, ... cit. 37, 122 S. W. 337; State ex rel. v. Dickmann, 146 Mo. App. 396, 124 S. W. 29; Haumueller v. Ackermann, 150 Mo. App. 141, 130 S. W. 91; Bracht v. Johnson, 187 Mo. App. 220, 173 S. W. 692; 39 Cyc. 853 ... Not only is the petition insufficient, as one attempting to state a ... ...
-
The Crane Company v. Smith
... ... Smith. Current River Lumber Co. v. Cravens, 54 ... Mo.App. 216; Schulenburg Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 38 ... Mo.App. 404; Simmons v. Carrier, 60 Mo. 581; ... House v. Carroll, 37 Mo. 578; Graves v ... Pierce, 53 Mo. 423; Stephens Lumber Co. v ... ...