Bracht v. Johnson

Decision Date15 February 1915
Docket NumberNo. 11341.,11341.
Citation187 Mo.App. 220,173 S.W. 692
PartiesBRACHT v. JOHNSON et al.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Gasconade County; R. A. Breuer, Judge.

Action by C. H. Bracht against Frank Johnson and another, begun in justice court, and appealed to circuit court. From a judgment there for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

J. H. Schaper, of Washington, Mo., and Robert Walker, of Hermann, for appellant. August Meyer, of Hermann, and J. W. Hensley, of Owensville, for respondents.

ELLISON, P. J.

This action was begun before a justice of the peace by filing the following written statement:

Frank Johnson and Christ Johnson to C. H. Bracht, Dr.

                For use and occupation of real estate of
                 said C. H. Bracht for anchorage of
                 cables and ferryboat on the west side
                 of the Gasconade river, at Fredericksburg
                 in Gasconade county, Missouri
                 in operating ferry boat over and across
                 said river at said place for ten years
                 from May 26, 1903, to May 26, 1913
                 said use and occupation having been
                 with the consent of said C. H. Bracht
                 and for the benefit and profit of said
                 Frank Johnson and Christ Johnson
                 and being of the reasonable value of
                 two hundred dollars.................       $200 00
                

Plaintiff had judgment before the justice, and defendants appealed. At the close of the evidence for plaintiff the circuit court directed a verdict for defendants, and plaintiff has brought the case here.

It seems that the land was on the bank of the Gasconade river, and was owned by the "A. O. U. W.," and that lodge sold it to plaintiff. Before plaintiff's purchase defendant Frank Johnson obtained a license for a ferry and operated the ferryboat by means of an overhead wire or cable which he fastened to the "fork of a tree" on the bluff standing nearly 45 feet above the river at its usual stage. He tied the cable to the tree with the permission of the "A. O. U. W.," and that was the situation when plaintiff bought. Defendant Frank operated the ferry until his five-year license expired, in February, 1906. Then defendant Christ obtained a license and operated it until February, 1912. Then defendant Frank again obtained a license, and was operating it in May, 1913, when this action was begun. During all these years, at least up to about the time the suit was brought, no objection was made to this "anchorage," nothing was said about a contract, nor was there ever any mention of compensation. Undoubtedly there was a mere...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Rupli v. South Mountain Heritage Soc'y, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • December 22, 2011
    ... ... 885 (1910) (mere conveyance of the legal title to the servient tenement will not render the subsequent user ipso facto adverse); Bracht v. Johnson, 187 Mo.App. 220, 173 S.W. 692 (1915) (license to use land was held to continue where new owner made no objections to the use); Sturnick ... ...
  • Thompson v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 1918
    ... ... plaintiff, purported to act with authority from plaintiff. 2 ... C. J. 435, tit. Agency; Somerville v. Railroad, 62 ... Mo. 391; Johnson v. Hurley, 115 Mo.App. 513. (6) And ... because plaintiff under such circumstances was estopped from ... denying the authority of said Bailey. 2 C ... S.W. 337; State ex rel. v. Dickmann, 146 Mo.App ... 396, 124 S.W. 29; Haumueller v. Ackermann, 150 ... Mo.App. 141, 130 S.W. 91; Bracht" v. Johnson, 187 ... Mo.App. 220, 173 S.W. 692; [199 Mo.App. 364] 39 Cyc. 853; ... Young, et al. v. Home Telephone Co., 201 S.W. 635.] ...     \xC2" ... ...
  • Thompson v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 1918
    ... ... Johnson Grain Co. v. Railroad, 177 Mo. App. 194, 164 S. W. 182 ...         Pursuing the argument advanced by appellant's counsel in this connection, ... cit. 37, 122 S. W. 337; State ex rel. v. Dickmann, 146 Mo. App. 396, 124 S. W. 29; Haumueller v. Ackermann, 150 Mo. App. 141, 130 S. W. 91; Bracht v. Johnson, 187 Mo. App. 220, 173 S. W. 692; 39 Cyc. 853 ...         Not only is the petition insufficient, as one attempting to state a ... ...
  • The Crane Company v. Smith
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • February 15, 1915
    ... ... Smith. Current River Lumber Co. v. Cravens, 54 ... Mo.App. 216; Schulenburg Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 38 ... Mo.App. 404; Simmons v. Carrier, 60 Mo. 581; ... House v. Carroll, 37 Mo. 578; Graves v ... Pierce, 53 Mo. 423; Stephens Lumber Co. v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT