Brackett's Estate, In re
Decision Date | 09 January 1959 |
Docket Number | No. 535,535 |
Parties | In re ESTATE of Laura M. BRACKETT, deceased. A. G. WAKEFIELD, Appellant, v. Mary Lenora BRACKETT and Sarah A. Corneil, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
McMullen, Rives and Baskin, H. H. Baskin, Jr., Clearwater, Hayden C. Covington, Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellant.
William M. Goza, Jr., Clearwater, for appellees.
This is an appeal from an order of the county judge holding the Last Will of Laura M. Brackett invalid for lack of testamentary capacity. The appeal is by A. G. Wakefield, named as Executor in said Will.
The beneficiaries under a prior will, Mary Lenora Brackett, the decedent's sister-in-law, and Sarah A. Corneil, the decedent's sister, contested decedent's Last Will on the grounds of incompetency and undue influence. After hearing extensive testimony, the county judge entered an order in which he held that the testatrix lacked testamentary capacity.
He attack on the decree of the lower court is primarily one questioning the sufficiency of the evidence and the court's application of the law to such evidence. The record on appeal contains over 435 pages of testimony and the evidence is sharply conflicting.
The testatrix, a childless widow, died December 29, 1956, at the age of eighty-one. Surviving her were a sister and a nephew; and also a sister-in-law. She had, prior to her death, lived in Clearwater, Florida, for about twenty years. Her husband had resided with her until his death in 1948. After her husband's death, she resided alone in her home.
On June 7, 1949, testatrix executed a Will in which she left her estate to her sister and her sister-in-law, share and share alike. Thereafter, the testatrix, in September, 1955, was baptized by the appellant, Wakefield, in the church generally known as Jehovah's Witnesses, the corporate name of which is the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society.
In February, 1956, the appellant contacted attorney Baskin for the purpose of having him draw a Will leaving all of the testatrix' property to the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. Previously, all of testatrix' legal work and had been handled by attorney Goza. Attorney Baskin had the testatrix examined by two physicians, one of whom reported that she was incapable of making a Will and the other that she was capable. The Will in question was executed June 4, 1956.
In June, 1956, incompetency proceedings were instituted to determine the mental condition of testatrix. Thereafter, on a hearing conducted before the county judge, the testatrix was declared incompetent. Testatrix died on December 29, 1956, the cause of death being given on the death certificate as 'cerebral vascular accident due to arterioschrotic cardiovascular-renal cerebral disease (the underlying cause being) qualified arterioslerosis and senility.' Thereafter, on January 4, 1957, the appellant offered the Will for probate. The appellees contested on the grounds above mentioned, and the order appealed from resulted.
The very able county judge, now a circuit judge, in his order holding the Will ineffective for lack of testamentary capacity, said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tibbs v. State
... ... See In re Estate of Brackett, 109 So.2d 375 (Fla.2d DCA 1959). 9 ... As a general proposition, an appellate court should not retry a case or ... ...
-
Moore v. State, 5D01-1232.
... ... See In re Estate of Brackett, 109 So.2d 375 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959) ... Id. at 1123 (footnote omitted) ... In deciding a motion for new ... ...
-
Wiggins v. Fla. Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles
... ... See In re Estate of Brackett , 109 So.2d 375 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959). As a general proposition, an appellate court should not retry a case or reweigh conflicting evidence ... ...
-
Jackson v. Granger Lumber Co., Inc.
... ... In Re Brackett's Estate, 109 So.2d 375 (Fla.App.1959); Walker v. Walker, 123 So.2d 692 (Fla.App.1960); 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 346 ... Although appellant's ... ...