Brackney v. Boyd
Decision Date | 12 December 1919 |
Docket Number | 10,062 |
Citation | 125 N.E. 238,71 Ind.App. 592 |
Parties | BRACKNEY ET AL. v. BOYD ET AL |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
71 Ind.App. 592. At 600.
Original Opinion of June 17, 1919, Reported at: 71 Ind.App. 592.
The petition for rehearing is overruled.
OPINIONON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
Some of the streets vacated were upon the margin of appellant's land as then owned by him and were made therefrom, and appellants contend that appellees should be restricted from going into possession of the lands embracing such streets so vacated beyond the center thereof. In the original opinion, it was held that when streets are vacated the fee thereof to the center of the street continues in the owner of the abutting land; in other words, it goes back to the grantee, immediate or remote, of the owner who dedicated it to public use. By the same principle, where the street or highway has been wholly made from, and upon the margin of, the grantor's land, the subsequent grant of the adjoining land should be deemed to comprehend the fee in the whole of the street so dedicated. This principle is so decided in the case of Irvin v. Crammond (1915), 58 Ind.App. 540, 108 N.E. 539, which is the case last cited in the original opinion. See, also, Johnson v. Grenell (1907), 188 N.Y. 407, 81 N.E. 161, 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 551; Haberman v. Baker (1891), 128 N.Y. 253, 28 N.E. 370, 13 L. R. A. 611.
The petition for rehearing is overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mochel v. Cleveland, 5641
... ... 111; Rowe v. James, 71 Wash. 267, 128 P. 539; ... Jose v. Hunter, 60 Ind.App. 569, 103 N.E. 392, 852; ... Brackney v. Boyd, 71 Ind.App. 592, 123 N.E. 695, 125 ... N.E. 238; Erwin v. Central Union Tel. Co., 148 Ind ... 365, 46 N.E. 667, 47 N.E. 663; Koshland ... ...
-
State ex rel. Mcguirk v. Davisson
... ... And the case of Brackney v. Boyd, 71 Ind. App. 592, 599, 123 N. E. 695, 125 N. E. 238, also cited by respondent, seems to have been based upon a misunderstanding of the facts ... ...
-
ATS Ford Drive Inv. v. United States
...land; in other words, it goes back to the grantee, immediate or remote, of the owner who dedicated it to public use." Brackney v. Boyd, 125 N.E. 238, 238 (Ind. App. 1919); accord AmRhein v. Eden, 779 N.E.2d 1197, 1209 (Ind.Ct.App. 2002) ("'Generally speaking when a street or highway is vaca......
-
Pressly v. United States
...land; in other words, it goes back to the grantee, immediate or remote, of the owner who dedicated it to public use." Brackney v. Boyd, 125 N.E. 238, 238 (Ind. App. 1919); accord AmRhein v. Eden, 779 N.E.2d 1197, 1209 (Ind.Ct.App. 2002) ("'Generally speaking when a street or highway is vaca......