Braddy v. State

• Decision Date: 15 June 2017
• Docket Number: No. SC15–404,No. SC16–481,SC15–404,SC16–481
• Citation: Braddy v. State, 219 So. 3d 803 (Fla. 2017)
• Parties: Harrel Franklin BRADDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Harrel Franklin Braddy, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent.
• Court: Florida Supreme Court

219 So.3d 803

Harrel Franklin BRADDY, Appellant,

v.STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Harrel Franklin Braddy, Petitioner,

v.Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent.

No. SC15–404

No. SC16–481

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 15, 2017

Neal A. Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, William M. Hennis, III, Litigation Director, and Jessica Houston, Staff Attorney, Office of the Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Hopkins, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent

PER CURIAM.

Harrel Franklin Braddy, an inmate under sentence of death, appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851.Braddy also petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus.We have jurisdiction.Seeart. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const.For the reasons that follow, we affirm the postconviction court's denial of relief for a new guilt phase but grant Braddy a new penalty phase based on the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Hurst v. Florida(Hurst v. Florida ), ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504(2016), and this Court's opinion on remand in Hurst v. State(Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40(Fla.2016), cert. denied , No. 16-998, –––U.S. ––––, ––– S.Ct. ––––, ––– L.Ed.2d ––––, 2017 WL 635999(U.S.May 22, 2017).

I.BACKGROUND

In 2007, Braddy was convicted of first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder, two counts of kidnapping, burglary of a structure with an assault or battery therein, child neglect causing great bodily harm, and attempted escape.Braddy v. State , 111 So.3d 810, 826(Fla.2012).On appeal, this Court set out the facts of the crimes:

The evidence presented at Braddy's trial revealed the following facts.Shandelle Maycock, mother to then five-year-old Quatisha, testified that she first met Braddy and his wife Cyteria through a mutual friend from church.Shortly after their initial meeting, Braddy began showing up at Shandelle's home alone, unannounced, and uninvited, staying for short periods of time with no apparent purpose.Shandelle testified that she initially thought of Braddy as a "nice person" and would occasionally ask him for small favors.Braddy once inappropriately placed his hand between Shandelle's legs, but when Shandelle became angry and threatened Braddy with a knife, Braddy left her apartment and later apologized for his actions.Shandelle testified that Braddy never again made a sexual advance toward her.

On Friday, November 6, 1998, Braddy picked Shandelle up from work and drove her home.After Braddy left Shandelle's apartment at approximately 5:30 p.m., Shandelle began to call around looking for a ride to pick up Quatisha, who was being watched by a family member.Shandelle had not found a ride by approximately 10 p.m., at which time Braddy returned to her apartment in a gold Lincoln Town Car that he had rented earlier in the day.Braddy told Shandelle that they needed to talk but agreed to first drive Shandelle to pick up Quatisha.After picking up Quatisha and returning to Shandelle's apartment, Braddy again stated that he needed to talk to Shandelle.Shandelle agreed, but before Braddy could talk to Shandelle, the phone rang.Shandelle answered the phone, had a brief conversation, and, after hanging up, told Braddy that he needed to leave because she was expecting company.Shandelle testified that this statement had been a lie—she had not been expecting company but simply wanted Braddy to leave because it was late and she was tired.Upon being told to leave, Braddy immediately attacked Shandelle, threatening to kill her and choking her until she lost consciousness.Shandelle testified that when she regained consciousness, she was still in her apartment but Braddy again choked her until she passed out.

Shandelle's landlord, who occupied the house to which Shandelle's apartment was attached, testified that he heard shouting coming from Shandelle's apartment shortly before midnight.When he looked outside a short time later, the landlord saw Braddy standing at the driver-side door of the Town Car and Quatisha standing by the passenger-side door.He did not see Shandelle.

Shandelle testified that when she awoke for the second time, she was in the back seat of a large car parked in her driveway.Quatisha was in the front passenger seat, and Braddy was in the driver's seat.As Braddy began to drive, Shandelle told Quatisha that they were going to jump out of the car.Braddy warned Shandelle not to jump, but Shandelle nevertheless pulled Quatisha into the backseat and opened the door.When Braddy saw that they were about to jump, he accelerated and turned a corner, causing Shandelle and Quatisha to fall out of the car.

Braddy stopped the car, helped Quatisha back into the car, and put Shandelle in the trunk.Shandelle testified that she remained in the trunk for thirty to forty-five minutes while Braddy continued to drive, after which time the car stopped and Braddy opened the trunk.Braddy pulled Shandelle out of the trunk, threw her to the ground, and again choked her until she lost consciousness, all the while threatening to kill her and accusing her of using him.When Shandelle woke up, it was daylight and she was lying in a remote area surrounded by foliage.Shandelle walked to the road and flagged down passing motorists, who called the police.

Between 1:30 and 2:30 a.m. on Saturday, November 7, Braddy returned home in the Town Car.Cyteria testified that she was awakened when Braddy came home and, when she went to the door to meet him, saw Braddy wiping down the interior of the Town Car with a cloth.Cyteria also testified that the washing machine was running and that when she looked inside the machine, she saw the clothes Braddy had been wearing earlier that night.

On November 7, police spoke to Shandelle at Glades Hospital, where she had been taken for treatment after being found on the side of the road that morning.Shandelle gave police her statement, along with the names and descriptions of Braddy and Quatisha.Detectives Giancarlo Milito and Juan Murias went to Braddy's home to determine Quatisha's whereabouts.Shortly after the detectives arrived at Braddy's house, they observed him exit the house and drive away in the Town Car.The detectives followed Braddy to a gas station and approached him as he was pumping gas.When the detectives first asked Braddy about Quatisha, Braddy appeared calm and denied any knowledge of the situation.However, when the detectives informed Braddy that Shandelle was alive and had implicated him in Quatisha's disappearance, Braddy turned pale, began to sweat, shake, and cry, and claimed to feel faint.Detective Milito testified that at this point, although Braddy was not under arrest, he placed Braddy in handcuffs for everyone's safety because of "the history that I had of him."

The detectives took Braddy to the Miami–Dade County Police Department and sent the Town Car to be processed.Detectives Otis Chambers and Fernando Suco began to question Braddy at approximately 9 p.m. on Saturday, November 7.When the detectives asked Braddy if he would consent to giving DNA samples, Braddy stated that he knew his rights and wished to be read his rights.Detective Suco, the lead investigator in the case, explained Braddy's rights to him pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436, 461, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694(1966), through the use of a standard Miranda form, which Braddy signed and initialed appropriately.After Braddy indicated that he understood and waived his rights, Detective Suco obtained Braddy's consent to take specimens for DNA samples and to search Braddy's home and the Town Car.However, because Braddy hesitated before signing the last consent form, Suco also obtained search warrants for Braddy's house and the Town Car.

Pursuant to both Braddy's consent to search and the search warrant, police searched the Town Car on Sunday, November 8.After being only partially processed, however, the Town Car was mistakenly released back to the rental agency, where it remained for approximately a day.Police were able to recover the Town Car before it had been cleaned by the rental agency, and pursuant to a second search warrant signed on November 10, investigators removed the trunk liner for DNA testing.Shandelle's blood was found on the liner.

Meanwhile, Braddy's interview continued early into the morning of November 8.Although Braddy spoke to the detectives—becoming visibly agitated when talking about Shandelle—he divulged no information about Quatisha's whereabouts.Feeling that they were not making any progress, the detectives took a break from the interview just before midnight on November 7.During the break, Detective Suco prepared Braddy's arrest form and conferred with other detectives who were gathering information on the case.Having determined that Braddy was lying to them, based on information received from other detectives, the detectives reinitiated the interview at approximately 1:15 a.m. on November 8 and confronted Braddy about lying.Braddy responded by saying, "I can't tell you.Even if I'm found innocent, my family will not talk to me again."The detectives continued to question Braddy, but although there was some interaction, Braddy refused to answer questions about Quatisha and mostly "just sat there or ... would put his head down."

At approximately 3 a.m. on November 8, Braddy asked to talk to Detective Chambers alone.The detectives complied, but after fifteen to twenty minutes of useless conversation, Detective Chambers brought Detective Suco back into the room.Shortly thereafter, both detectives escorted Braddy to the bathroom, which he had asked to use.While walking through the homicide office to and from the bathroom, Braddy appeared to be "looking around" and "seeing where he was at."After returning from the bathroom, the

...