Bradley v. Palmer
Decision Date | 24 October 1901 |
Citation | 193 Ill. 15,61 N.E. 856 |
Parties | BRADLEY et al. v. PALMER et al. OGDEN v. SAME. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Cook county; R. S. Tuthill, Judge.
Bill by Frank T. W. Palmer and others against Fordyce G. Bradley, as executor of the will of Anna M. Benedict, deceased, and others, to set aside the will of said Anna M. Benedict. From a judgment in favor of contestants, proponents Fordyce G. Bradley and Oricia E. Ogden appeal. Reversed.Herrick, Allen, Boyesen & Martin and Wilson, Moore & McIlvaine, for appellants.
Francis W. Walker and Albert G. Welch, for appellee Frank T. W. Palmer.
The appellee Frank T. W. Palmer filed his bill in the court below to set aside the last will, and probate thereof, of his mother, Anna M. Benedict, deceased. Said will is as follows:
The value of Mrs. Benedict's estate was about $500,000. It consisted of real and personal property, all in Cook county, this state.
The bill alleged that at the time the will was made the testatrix was not of sound mind and memory, and, in addition, that at the time of and for several years prior to the making of the will she was in ill health and suffered great bodily pain, and that she traveled from place to place in Europe in search of relief, and was continually, until she died, under the medical treatment of Dr. Eugene Dupuy, a physician, who resided in Paris, France; that when she executed the will she was of about the age of 61 years, and was greatly enfeebled by age and disease, and was subject, mentally, the the control and influence of those persons who surrounded her; that prior to and at the time of the execution of the will said Fordyce G. Bradley and Eugene Dupuy, and each of them, by false and malicious statements concerning the habits and conduct of the complainant and his wife, Mary A. Palmer, imposed upon and deceived Mrs. Benedict, the testatrix, and so influenced and poisoned her mind against the complainant and his wife as to create upon her part an unreasonable, unnatural, and unjust prejudice against them; and that by reason of such prejudice and the unsound mind and memory of the testatrix said pretended will was executed. It was further alleged that, while Mrs. Benedict remained unsound in mind and memory and subject to the influences aforesaid, said Dupuy, through his agents and servants, prevented the testatrix from seeing persons other than his own immediate family, her nurses, and such other persons as were in sympathy with him and said Bradley, and hindered and prevented all communication between the complainant, who then resided in America, and his mother, the testatrix, and that said Dupuy and Bradley deceived the complainant concerning her condition of health, and concealed from him her critical condition, of which he remained in ignorance till her death. Answers were filed denying the allegations of falsehood and misrepresentations and all acts of alleged undue influence on the part of said Dupuy and Bradley, and denying that the testatrix was of unsound mind and memory. Upon replication being filed, an issue at law was made up and submitted for trial to a jury,-whether or not the said instrument set forth in the bill, dated March 25, 1895, and admitted to probate in the probate court of Cook county as the last will and testament of Anna M. Benedict, deceased, is her last will and testament....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Taylor v. McClintock
...P. 527; 81 N.E. 482; 53 Md. 376; 110 Mass. 477; 2 McCart., 202; 17 A. 826; 55 N.E. 305; 77 N.Y. 533; 35 S.E. 278; 48 S.E. 306; 48 P. 130; 61 N.E. 856; 24 N.E. 5. The evidence of the expert witnesses is not sufficient to sustain the verdict: (a) Because their opinions were based on medical t......
-
Dowie v. Sutton
...125 Ill. 262, 17 N. E. 450;Entwistle v. Meikle, 180 Ill. 9, 54 N. E. 217;Greene v. Greene, 145 Ill. 264, 33 N. E. 941;Bradley v. Palmer, 193 Ill. 15, 61 N. E. 856. The effect of the verdict in such cases being the same as in cases at law, when a case is appealed to the Appellate Court, and ......
-
Drum v. Capps
...although there are some expressions in the cases cited tending to support counsel's argument. We had occasion, however, in Bradley v. Palmer, 193 Ill. 15, 61 N. E. 856, to review the authorities on this question fully, and we there held that the authorities cited, fairly construed, do not s......
-
Healea v. Keenan
...this court will not disturb the verdict unless it is manifestly against the weight of the evidence, which is not the case here. Bradley v. Palmer, 193 Ill. 15 .’ See, also, Calvert v. Carpenter, 96 Ill. 63;Petefish v. Becker, 176 Ill. 448, 52 N. E. 71;French v. French, 215 Ill. 470, 74 N. E......