Bradley v. State
Citation | 554 S.W.3d 440 |
Decision Date | 09 May 2018 |
Docket Number | WD 80406 |
Parties | In the MATTER OF the CARE AND TREATMENT OF LESTER BRADLEY a/k/a Lester B. Bradley, a/k/a Lester Bernard Bradley, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Chelseá R. Mitchell, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Christine Lesicko, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges
Lester Bradley appeals, following a jury trial, a judgment finding him to be a sexually violent predator and committing him to the Department of Mental Health for control, care, and treatment. Bradley raises eight points on appeal. The first two points challenge the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss based upon the court’s failure to hold a probable cause hearing within 72 hours of Bradley’s detention, as required by § 632.489.1 Bradley’s third and fourth points challenge the admission of testimony from the State’s expert witness Dr. Kimberly Weitl. His fifth point challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s determination that Bradley is a sexually violent predator. And his final three points raise constitutional challenges to the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). Finding no error, we affirm.
This appeal comes after a second jury found Bradley to be a sexually violent predator. The following background information is taken from Bradley’s first appeal to this court after his first trial held in January of 2013:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson
...is on the appellant to prove the trial court abused its discretion and prejudice resulted. Matter of Care & Treatment of Lester Bradley v. State , 554 S.W.3d 440, 452 (Mo. App. W.D. 2018).Analysis The admissibility of expert testimony is governed by section 490.065 as amended by the Missour......
-
Revis v. Bassman
...proving the trial court abused its discretion and prejudice resulted. Jones, 569 S.W.3d at 53 ; Matter of Care & Treatment of Lester Bradley v. State, 554 S.W.3d 440, 452 (Mo. App. W.D. 2018) (internal citation omitted).Section 490.065 governs the admissibility of expert opinion testimony. ......
-
Sophian Plaza Ass'n v. City of Kan. City
...(quoting Washington by Washington v. Barnes Hosp., 897 S.W.2d 611, 616 (Mo. banc 1995)); see also, e.g., In re Care and Treatment of Bradley, 554 S.W.3d 440, 454-55 (Mo. App. W.D. 2018); Peters v. Gen. Motors Corp., 200 S.W.3d 1, 19 (Mo. App. W.D. 2006). "'An appellant cannot 'back-door' an......
-
Jones v. City of Kan. City
...that the trial court abused its discretion and showing that [it] has suffered prejudice." Matter of Care and Treatment of Lester Bradley v. State , 554 S.W.3d 440, 452 (Mo. App. W.D. 2018).Section 490.065 was amended effective August 28, 2017 to create a new standard for determining the adm......