Bragg v. Missouri Pacific R.R., 54119
| Decision Date | 13 September 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 54119,54119 |
| Citation | Bragg v. Missouri Pacific R.R., 756 S.W.2d 666 (Mo. App. 1988) |
| Parties | Ronald BRAGG, et al., Appellant, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD, et al., Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Shaw, Howlett & Schwartz, Charles M. Shaw, St. Louis, for appellants.
Shepherd, Sandberg & Phoenix, P.C., Theodore J. Williams, Jr., Ronald L. Vance, St. Louis, for respondents.
Ronald Bragg, husband of Twana Marie Bragg, attempts an appeal from an order of the trial court which approved a settlement of $195,000 for the wrongful death of Twana Marie Bragg.Plaintiffs were appellant-husband, Rebecca Hampsten, mother, and Roger Barton, father.Plaintiffs are members of class one under Section 537.080(1) A.L.1979[RSMo 1986].Only husband appeals.
On September 29, 1984, an Amtrak train struck the car Marie was driving at a crossing with tracks of defendant Missouri Pacific Railroad.At the time of her death she was seventeen years old and her husband, of six months, was eighteen years old.Her parents were divorced when she was eighteen months old.For approximately the first two years after the divorce, Marie's father was in the military service and unavailable.After his return he saw Marie every other month until she was nine years of age.He did not visit with his daughter between the time she was nine and fifteen years old.He was not faithful to a child support obligation.Prior to her marriage, Marie lived with her mother except between December, 1983 and February, 1984 when she lived with her husband and his parents.
The partial judgment entered by the trial court from which husband has attempted to appeal is as follows:
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Missouri Pacific Railroad Company's Motion to Enforce Settlement and the similar motion filed on behalf of Roger Barton are granted and that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs, Ronald Bragg, Rebecca Hampsten, and Roger Barton, and against National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Missouri Pacific Railroad Company in the amount of $195,000 plus court costs.The distribution of said settlement amount, after deduction for attorney's fees and expenses, will await further Order of the Court.(Our emphasis)
Obviously, the court did not consider the judgment to be a final judgment.It recites that further orders are anticipated.It does not purport to comply with the requirements of Sections 537.095.3 or 537.095.4 A.L. 1979[RSMo 1986] which requires judgment in a wrongful death suit to include: (1) a determination of total damages or total settlement approved; and, (2) apportionment of damages among those persons entitled thereto as determined by the court.
Initially, we consider sua sponte whether this court has jurisdiction to consider the appeal.In this case, the court has not made a distribution of the total settlement.The order is not, by its terms a final judgment.Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed.Section 512.020 RSMo 1986 permits an appeal only from a final judgment.Nor did the court designate that part of the order which was entered as final for purposes of appeal.Moreover, such order would have been without effect, if entered, since the court cannot make a judgment final which is not, in fact, final.State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Armacost Motors Inc., 502 S.W.2d 330, 332(Mo.1973).The circumstances of this...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Kopp v. Franks
...has jurisdiction and to determine if the purported order challenged is one from which an appeal can be taken. Bragg v. Missouri Pacific R.R., 756 S.W.2d 666, 667 (Mo.App.1988). Because the endorsement on the bond by the trial court of its approval of the bond is not a "special order after f......
-
Kilmer v. Browning
...as provided in § 537.095.3, RSMo 1986. See Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 788 S.W.2d 345 (Mo.App.1990); Bragg v. Missouri Pacific R.R., 756 S.W.2d 666 (Mo.App.1988). That occurred here, if somewhat belatedly. Certain facts are undisputed. Other evidence will be referred to in dis......
-
Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.
...wrongful death case is not final till the damages are apportioned among multiple plaintiffs or beneficiaries. Bragg v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, 756 S.W.2d 666, 667 (Mo.App.1988). It would be advisable for the trial court also to include in the judgment the provisions of subsection 4 of th......
-
Koenen v. BRG Liberty, LLC
... ... No. ED 110045 Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE. Filed: ... ...
-
Section 38 Allocation of Damages Among Survivors
...have been so apportioned. Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 788 S.W.2d 345, 346 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990) (citing Bragg v. Mo. Pac. R.R., 756 S.W.2d 666, 667 (Mo. App. E.D. 1988)).For further examples of distribution and apportionment, see: State ex rel. Griffin v. Belt, 941 S.W.2d 570 (Mo.......