Brake v. Murphy
| Decision Date | 26 December 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-824,96-824 |
| Citation | 687 So.2d 842 |
| Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly D64 Robert M. BRAKE and Eileen M. Brake, Appellants, v. Eve E. MURPHY and Richard Murphy, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert M. Brake, for appellants.
Richard T. Kozek, Jr.; Paul M. Kade, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and SHEVIN, JJ.
Defendants Robert M. Brake and Eileen M. Brake appeal a final judgment setting aside as fraudulent two title transfers from Eileen M. Brake to Robert M. Brake. We reverse the judgment.
As a threshold issue, we are unpersuaded by the plaintiffs' argument that they were the proper parties to bring this action. Plaintiffs, heirs of the Estate of Eileen Murphy, brought the action to set aside fraudulent conveyances. Plaintiffs asserted that Eileen Brake effected the transfers to avoid execution on a surcharge order in the Estate's favor. The surcharge was imposed as a result of her mismanagement of Estate property during her service as the Estate's personal representative. The surcharge order inured to the Estate's benefit. As such, the personal representative is the proper party to bring an action on the Estate's behalf. § 733.607, Fla.Stat. (1995).
Additionally, we find that the court erred in declining to rule on the Brakes' resulting trust affirmative defense. The trial court had equity jurisdiction to decide the resulting trust issue, an equitable claim. § 26.012(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1995); see Espino v. Anez, 665 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). We express no opinion as to the merits of this defense.
Based on the foregoing, we reverse the final judgment and remand for a new trial on all issues including the resulting trust affirmative defense. The personal representative shall be substituted as the proper party plaintiff. See Casa Linda Tile & Marble Installers, Inc. v. Highlands Place 1981, Ltd., 642 So.2d 766 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kennedy v. Carnival Corp.
...behalf of an estate is the duly appointed legal representative of the estate. Tennyson , 477 F. App'x at 611 (citing Brake v. Murphy , 687 So. 2d 842, 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ; Fla. Stat. Ann. § 733.607(1) ). Here, Plaintiff concedes that she is not a personal representative of the Decedent'......
-
The Florida Bar v. Brake
...District Court of Appeal, 666 So.2d 142 (Fla.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1147, 116 S.Ct. 1019, 134 L.Ed.2d 99 (1996); Brake v. Murphy, 687 So.2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), review denied, 697 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1997); Brake v. Estate of Murphy, 678 So.2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Brake v. Murphy, ......
-
Giller v. Giller
...Stat. (2011) ; Tennyson v. ASCAP, 477 F. App'x 608 (11th Cir.2012) ; Sullivan v. Sessions, 80 So.2d 706 (Fla.1955) ; Brake v. Murphy, 687 So.2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ; cf. Disque v. Unger, 955 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that trial court properly dismissed estate's complaint fo......
-
Keul v. Hodges Blvd. Presbyterian Church
...compelling recipient of assets or funds from an estate to return them, citing section 733.812, Florida Statutes ); Brake v. Murphy, 687 So.2d 842, 842–43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (affirming order granting personal representative's action to set aside fraudulent conveyances undertaken to avoid exe......
-
Business & commercial cases
...Stage Employees & Moving Picture Mach. Operators Holding Co., Inc. , 902 So. 2d 959, 963 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ; Brake v. Murphy , 687 So.2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) . Here, legal and equitable issues were “intertwined” so there was no error in submitting such fact issues to the jury. See B......