Branam v. Aqua-Clear Pools, Inc.

Decision Date17 April 1996
Docket NumberNos. 94-2564,95-2951,AQUA-CLEAR,s. 94-2564
Citation672 So.2d 69
Parties21 Fla. L. Weekly D916 H. Harry BRANAM and Jeanette Branam, Appellants, v.POOLS, INC., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Paul Morris, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Jonas & Silberman and Daniel E. Jonas, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GERSTEN and FLETCHER, JJ.

FLETCHER, Judge.

J. Harry Branam and his wife, Jeanette Branam [the Branams], appeal an adverse final judgment and a judgment of attorney's fees, entered after a jury verdict in favor of Aqua-Clear Pools, Inc. We find that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence and reverse both judgments.

The Branams entered into a contract with Aqua-Clear for the construction of a pool, spa, and patio, after having requested price estimates from Aqua-Clear and two other companies. Aqua-Clear, although the highest in price of the companies, was selected by the Branams on the basis of its promise of first-class workmanship. Aqua-Clear's performance under the contract was not to the satisfaction of the Branams, who declined to pay the balance of the contract price. Aqua-Clear sued for the balance and the Branams counterclaimed for damages incurred in correcting allegedly unworkmanlike performance by Aqua-Clear.

The record, including photographic evidence, clearly and unequivocally demonstrates flawed workmanship by Aqua-Clear. The interlocking bricks of the patio were installed without the proper foundation, causing gaps; the patio was not pitched, causing drainage problems (the only drainage available being through the gaps in the interlocking bricks); the border of the patio was a non-matching cement finish; the pool pump room was built so as to lean over; the spa was built out of round; etc. The Branams were forced to contract for and expend...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Miami-Dade Police Department v. Martinez, 3D01-3391.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 de março de 2003
    ...though there were conflicts in the testimony, and there was some evidence tending to support the finding."); Branam v. Aqua-Clear Pools, Inc., 672 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Ziontz v. Ocean Trail Unit Owners Ass'n, Inc., 663 So.2d 1334 (Fla. 3d DCA We are content, however, to make this ob......
  • Russell v. KSL Hotel Corp.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 22 de setembro de 2004
    ...Nat'l Bank v. Sherouse, 80 Fla. 405, 86 So. 279 (1920); Newman v. Smith, 77 Fla. 633, 82 So. 236 (1918); Branam v. Aqua-Clear Pools, Inc., 672 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Ziontz v. Ocean Trail Unit Owners Ass'n, Inc., 663 So.2d 1334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Accordingly, I would order a new tri......
  • Spence v. Florida Unemp. Appeals Com'n
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 de abril de 2007
    ...Police Dep't v. Martinez, 838 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review dismissed, 851 So.2d 729 (Fla.2003); Branam v. Aqua-Clear Pools, Inc., 672 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Ziontz v. Ocean Trail Unit Owners Ass'n, Inc., 663 So.2d 1334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Uhley v. Tapio Constr. Co., Inc., 573......
  • JONES BOAT YARD, INC. v. Jones, 97-2945.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 24 de março de 1999
    ...entered below and remand for entry of judgment in favor of JBY, naming it owner of the property at issue. See Branam v. Aqua-Clear Pools, Inc., 672 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Reversed and remanded with ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT