Brander v. Stoddard

Decision Date25 October 2017
Citation171 A.3d 456 (Mem),327 Conn. 928
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
Parties Bert BRANDER v. Trisha STODDARD, Temporary Administrator (Estate of Lily B. Frey), et al.

Proloy K. Das, Sarah Gruber and Patrick E. Power, in support of the petition.

John L. Laudati, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn.App. 730, 164 A.3d 889 (2017), is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Santos v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • November 13, 2018
    ...Hemingway , 297 Conn. 317, 321, 2 A.3d 857 (2010) ; Brander v. Stoddard , 173 Conn. App. 730, 732, 164 A.3d 889, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 928, 171 A.3d 456 (2017).The judgment is affirmed.AppendixALEXIS SANTOSv.COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION* Superior Court, Judicial District of TollandFile No. ......
  • Dowling v. Heirs of Bond
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • October 18, 2022
    ..., 196 Conn. App. 785, 794, 230 A.3d 826 (2020) ; Brander v. Stoddard , 173 Conn. App. 730, 747, 164 A.3d 889, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 928, 171 A.3d 456 (2017) ; Mulle v. McCauley , 102 Conn. App. 803, 813–14, 927 A.2d 921, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 907, 931 A.2d 265 (2007) ; Rudder v. Mamanas......
  • Micek-Holt v. Papageorge
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • March 27, 2018
    ...Hemingway , 297 Conn. 317, 321, 2 A.3d 857 (2010) ; Brander v. Stoddard , 173 Conn. App. 730, 732, 164 A.3d 889, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 928, 171 A.3d 456 (2017).The judgments are affirmed.APPENDIXANDREA MICEK–HOLT, EXECUTRIX (ESTATE OF EDWARD F. MICEK) v. MARY PAPAGEORGE ET AL.* MARY PAPAG......
  • Anderson v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • June 8, 2021
    ...Hemingway , 297 Conn. 317, 321, 2 A.3d 857 (2010) ; Brander v. Stoddard , 173 Conn. App. 730, 732, 164 A.3d 889, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 928, 171 A.3d 456 (2017).The judgment is affirmed.In this opinion the other judges concurred.1 The petitioner also challenges the habeas court's determina......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT