Brandies v. Cochrane

Decision Date01 October 1881
Citation105 U.S. 262,26 L.Ed. 989
PartiesBRANDIES v. COCHRANE
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

Mr. Edwin F. Bayley in support of the motion.

Mr. John S. Monk, contra.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a motion to dismiss because the appeal was not taken within two years after the entry of the decree.

It appears from the record that the decree was entered on the 2d of August, 1879, and on the same day the complainants prayed an appeal, which was allowed upon their giving bond according to law. No bond was ever given under this allowance, and the case was not docketed here at the October Term, 1879. On the first of August, 1881, the circuit judge approved a bond for an appeal from the decree and signed a citation. The bond was on the same day filed with the clerk, and the citation served on the 18th of August. On the 8th of October the Circuit Court entered an order allowing the appeal nunc pro tunc as of August 1. The case was regularly docketed in this court on the 13th of October.

The circuit judge, by taking the security and signing the citation, allowed an appeal. No formal order of allowance was necessary. Sage v. Railroad Company, 96 U. S. 712; Draper v. Davis, 102 id. 370. The appeal was, therefore, taken in time. The order of October 8th was not required to give it effect.

Motion denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • Blaffer v. New Orleans Water Supply Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 31 Marzo 1908
    ... ... months after the entry of the decree sought to be reviewed ... Evans v. Bank, 134 U.S. 330, 10 Sup.Ct. 493, 33 ... L.Ed. 917; Brandies v. Cochrane, 105 U.S. 262, 26 ... L.Ed. 989; The Dos Hermanos, 10 Wheat. 306, 6 L.Ed. 328; ... Wickelman v. A. B. Dick Company, 85 F. 851, 29 ... ...
  • Midland Terminal Ry. Co. v. Warinner
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 12 Noviembre 1923
    ... ... Whitmire, 223 U.S. 109, 32 Sup.Ct. 200, 56 ... L.Ed. 370; Aspen M. & S. Co. v. Billings, 150 U.S ... 31, 35, 14 Sup.Ct. 4, 37 L.Ed. 986; Brandies v ... Cochrane, 105 U.S. 262, 26 L.Ed. 989; Goddard v ... Ordway, 101 U.S. 745, 752, 25 L.Ed. 1040 ... (2) ... After an appeal or ... ...
  • Lockman v. Lang
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 18 Julio 1904
    ... ... Court of Appeals. Sage v. Railroad Co., 96 U.S. 712, ... 715, 24 L.Ed. 641; Draper v. Davis, 102 U.S. 370, ... 371, 26 L.Ed. 121; Brandies v. Cochrane, 105 U.S ... 262, 26 L.Ed. 989; National Bank v. Omaha, 96 U.S ... 737, 24 L.Ed. 881. A citation to appear at the hearing in the ... ...
  • Loveless v. Ransom
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 25 Junio 1901
    ... ... approval of the appeal bond. Sage v. Railroad Co., ... 96 U.S. 712, 24 L.Ed. 641; Draper v. Davis, 102 U.S ... 370, 26 L.Ed. 121; Brandies v. Cochrane, 105 U.S ... 262, 26 L.Ed. 989; Trust Co. v. Stockton, 18 C.C.A ... 408, 72 F. 1; In re Fiechtl (C.C.A.) 107 F. 618. So, ... in the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT