Brannan v. Humphrey
| Decision Date | 09 June 2014 |
| Docket Number | No. 13–1220.,13–1220. |
| Citation | 573 U.S. 906,189 L.Ed.2d 766,134 S.Ct. 2732 (Mem) |
| Parties | Andrew H. BRANNAN, petitioner, v. Carl HUMPHREY, Warden. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
59 cases
-
Flowers v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., Case No. 3:16-cv-539-J-39JRK
......§ 2254(e)(1). But, this presumption Page 6 of correctness applies only to findings of fact, not mixed determinations of law and fact. Brannan v. GDCP Warden , 541 F. App'x 901, 903-904 (11th Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (recognizing the distinction between a pure question of fact from a mixed ......
-
Johnson v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.
......§ 2254(e)(1)). This presumption of correctness, however, applies only to findings of fact, not mixed determinations of law and fact. Brannan v. GDCP Warden , 541 F. App'x 901, 903-904 (11th Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (recognizing the distinction between a pure question of fact from a mixed ......
-
Gallion v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.
...Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (recognizing the distinction between a pure question of fact from a mixed question of law and fact), cert. denied, 573 U.S. 906 (2014). Where there has been one reasoned state court judgment rejecting a federal claim followed by an unexplained order upholding that ju......
-
Taylor v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.
......§ 2254(e)(1)). This presumption of correctness, however, applies only to findings of fact, not mixed determinations of law and fact. Brannan v. GDCP Warden , 541 F. App'x 901, 903-904 (11th Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (recognizing the distinction between a pure question of fact from a mixed ......
Request a trial to view additional results