Brannan v. State

Decision Date28 January 1903
CitationBrannan v. State, 72 S.W. 184, 44 Tex.Cr.R. 399 (Tex. Crim. App. 1903)
PartiesBRANNAN v. STATE.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL>
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Hill county court; L. C. Hill, Judge.

W. C. Brannan was convicted of aiding a prisoner to escape, and appeals. Reversed.

J. E. Clarke, for appellant. Robt. A. John, Asst. Atty. Gen., C. F. Greenwood, Co. Atty., and B. Y. Cummings, Asst. Co. Atty., for the State.

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of aiding a prisoner to escape, in violation of article 229, Pen. Code, and fined $50.

Article 229, Pen. Code, reads as follows: "If any person shall willfully aid a prisoner to escape from the custody of an officer, by whom he is legally detained in custody on an accusation for a misdemeanor, by doing an act calculated to effect that object, he shall be punished by fine," etc. Appellant's contention is that this article has no application to the facts adduced in evidence, and that under the testimony he is not guilty of violating it. The uncontroverted evidence is that appellant's principal had been convicted in three cases of misdemeanor, and placed in charge of the proper officer, and was being worked upon the road as a county convict under these convictions at the time of his escape. The state's contention is that the terms of article 229 apply as well to defendants after conviction as pending prosecution, and it cites in support of this article 240, Pen. Code, which provides: "The word `accusation,' as used here, and in every part of this Code, means a charge made in a lawful manner against any person, that he has been guilty of some offense, which subjects him to prosecution in the name of the state. A person is said to be `accused' of an offense from the time that any `criminal action' shall have been commenced against him. A legal arrest without warrant; a complaint to a magistrate; a warrant legally issued; and indictment, or an information, are all examples of `accusation,' and a person proceeded against by either of these is said to be `accused.'" As we understand an "accusation" under our statute, it applies to a pending prosecution, and when that prosecution has been terminated in a conviction it ceases to be an accusation After a conviction or the judgment of guilty, a party is termed a "convict" when he has accepted the sentence or judgment of conviction as a finality, which has been adjudged against him by the court of last resort which has jurisdiction of his case to which he may have thought proper to appeal. Article 27, Pen. Code; ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Ex parte Matthews
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 23, 1996
    ...among others are examples of "accusation," under any one of such proceeding a person is said to be "accused." Brannan v. State, 44 Tex.Cr.R. 399, 72 S.W. 184, 185 (1903). Similarly, because one is not "accused" unless charged with an offense, a magistrate cannot conduct an examining trial u......
  • Ex parte Williams
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • January 8, 1954
    ...of an indictment of information regard shall be had to such reference. Sec. 42-607(2), rules of criminal procedure. See Brannan v. State, 44 Tex.Cr.R. 399, 72 S.W. 184; Utterback v. State, 153 Ind. 545, 55 N.E. 420; People v. Frey, 112 Mich. 251, 70 N.W. That the trial court shared the view......
  • Holloway v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 20, 1989
    ...which the law provides from bringing offenders to justice[.]" See former article 24, Penal Code 1925. In Brennan v. State, 44 Tex.Cr.R. 399, 401, 72 S.W. 184, 185 (1903), the Court observed that article 240 of the 1895 penal code defined "accusation" as "a charge made in a lawful manner aga......
  • Burnett v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 30, 1974
    ...him by the court of last resort which has jurisdiction of his case to which he may have thought proper to appeal.' Brannan v. State, 44 Tex.Cr.R. 399, 72 S.W. 184, at 185. Article 25, V.A.P.C. of 1925, 3 defines the term convict. 'An accused is termed a 'convict' after the judgment of convi......
  • Get Started for Free