Brannon v. State, ED 97868.
| Decision Date | 28 August 2012 |
| Docket Number | No. ED 97868.,ED 97868. |
| Citation | Brannon v. State, 375 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. App. 2012) |
| Parties | Robert BRANNON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Steven R. Ohmer, Judge.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Robert Brannon(“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Brannon v. Russell
...claim of ineffective assistance (Resp't Ex. G). On August 28, 2012, the denial of his motion was affirmed in Brannon v. State, 375 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012) (per curiam). Petitioner did not apply for transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court. On September 12, 2013, Petitioner filed a peti......
- Sauls v. Pinnacle Entm't, Inc.