Branson v. Public Employees' Retirement Fund, 49A02-8711-CV-00449
Docket Nº | No. 49A02-8711-CV-00449 |
Citation | 538 N.E.2d 11 |
Case Date | May 17, 1989 |
Court | Court of Appeals of Indiana |
Page 11
v.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT FUND and Police and
Firefighters' Pension Fund, Appellees.
Second District.
Leslie P. Simpson, Indianapolis, for appellant.
Harry Dudley Miller, Indianapolis, for appellees.
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Philip O. Branson appeals the judgment of the reviewing court which affirmed the decision of the State Board of the Public Employees' Retirement Fund (the PERF board). The PERF board had denied a disability claim.
We affirm.
Branson sustained injuries in March of 1984 during the course of his employment with the Muncie Police Department. From the time of the injury until August of 1984, he remained an active fund member of the 1977 Police and Firefighters' Pension Fund. In August, Branson resigned and sought employment as a federal protective officer while still undergoing treatment for his injuries. Not until April of 1985 was he diagnosed as being permanently, partially disabled. In March of 1986, Branson applied
Page 12
for and was denied disability benefits. The PERF board affirmed the denial, finding that Branson was not an active fund member at the time of his application. The reviewing court affirmed because Branson was not an active fund member at the time of his being diagnosed as disabled and because he failed to show that no suitable and available work existed.At issue is the time at which one must be an active fund member of the Police and Firefighters' Pension Fund in order to qualify for disability benefits. Indiana Code 36-8-8-12(a) (Burns Code Ed.Repl.1989) provides:
"If an active fund member is permanently or temporarily unable to perform all suitable and available work with the police or fire department for which the member is or may be capable of becoming qualified, as determined under section 13 [IC 36-8-8-13] of this chapter, the member is entitled to receive during the disability a benefit equal to the benefit the member would have received if the member had retired. During a reasonable period in which an active member is becoming qualified for suitable work, or while suitable work is unavailable, the member is entitled to continue receiving disability benefit payments."
Under the statute, membership is required during the period in which one trains to become qualified for suitable work and in which one waits for suitable work to become available. Thus, the statute requires active fund membership beyond the time of injury.
Cases concerning retirement benefits, awarded from the same fund as disability benefits, hold that the statutory requirements at the time of application for such benefits are the applicable requirements. Under Indiana's compulsory contribution...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mickey v. Mickey, 18126.
...(right to accidental disability pension does not vest until employee becomes disabled); Branson v. Public Employees' Retirement Fund, 538 N.E.2d 11, 12 (Ind.App.1989) (based on statutory language, right to all pension benefits, including normal retirement benefits and accidental disability ......
-
Mickey v. Mickey, 18126.
...(right to accidental disability pension does not vest until employee becomes disabled); Branson v. Public Employees' Retirement Fund, 538 N.E.2d 11, 12 (Ind.App.1989) (based on statutory language, right to all pension benefits, including normal retirement benefits and accidental disability ......