Bray v. Elmore County Irrigation Co.
Decision Date | 29 January 1896 |
Citation | 44 P. 432,4 Idaho 685 |
Parties | BRAY v. ELMORE COUNTY IRRIGATION COMPANY |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
COMPLAINT-CAUSE OF ACTION.-Held, that the complaint states a cause of action.
(Syllabus by the court.)
APPEAL from District Court, Elmore County.
Judgment affirmed Costs awarded to respondent.
E. M Wolfe, for Appellant.
This is an action for damages for the breach of an alleged contract to furnish water for the year 1892. There was a demurrer filed and overruled. Trial had, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff for $ 500; from the judgment on said verdict this appeal is taken. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. They plead the contract in haec verba, and set out a copy by exhibit, which exhibit does not contain the necessary elements of a contract in either of the following particulars: Mutuality of agreement, time or quantity. Where a contract is declared on in haec verba it must contain all the averments necessary to the proper pleading of the case. (Joseph v. Holt, 37 Cal. 253.) There was no agreement to furnish plaintiff any certain quantity of water at any certain time in the year 1892. The case of More v. Elmore County Irr. Co., 3 Idaho 729, 35 P. 171, decided at the December, 1893, term of this court, and the case at bar are identical.
Texas Angel, for Respondent, filed no brief.
Following is a copy of the complaint:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sweeney v. Johnson
... ... Twin Falls County. Hon. Edward A. Walters, Judge ... Action ... to foreclose a ... averment." (Moore v. Elmore Irr. Co., 3 Idaho ... 729, 35 P. 171; Bray v. Elmore County Irr. Co., 4 ... ...
-
Metzker v. Lowther
... ... from District Court, Seventh District, Canyon County; A. O ... Sutton, Judge ... See ... also 69 Idaho 115, 203 ... Since the case ... of Bray v. Elmore County Irrigation Co., 4 Idaho ... 685, 44 P. 432, it has been ... ...
-
Mellen v. Great Western Beet Sugar Co.
...and furnish water to the water right holders thereunder. (More v. Elmore County Irr. Co., 3 Idaho 729, 35 P. 171; Bray v. Elmore County Irr. Co., 4 Idaho 685, 44 P. 432.) is purely a question of intent coupled with an actual relinquishment of the right. (Welch v. Garrett, 5 Idaho 639, 51 P.......