Brazoria County v. Padgitt
| Decision Date | 15 October 1913 |
| Citation | Brazoria County v. Padgitt, 160 S.W. 1170 (Tex. App. 1913) |
| Parties | BRAZORIA COUNTY v. PADGITT et al. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Coleman County; John W. Goodwin, Judge.
Trespass to try title by Brazoria County against Mrs. Willie Day Padgitt and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Louis J. Wilson, W. T. Williams, and Masterson & Rucks, all of Angleton, for appellant. Snodgrass, Dibrell & Snodgrass, of Coleman, for appellees.
This is a suit of trespass to try title, brought by appellant to recover land in Coleman county, Tex Appellees, in addition to a plea of not guilty, alleged they claimed under a deed executed by E. N. Wilson and A. J. Burke, Jr., who were appointed by the commissioners' court of Brazoria county to sell said land; that said deed had been ratified by said court; that their title was res adjudicata by reason of certain proceedings in the probate court of Travis county, and alleged their willingness to pay any balance of the purchase money that might be found to be due on said land. They also pleaded improvements in good faith.
Findings of Fact.
(1) The land in controversy was Brazoria county school land, patented to the school commissioners of said county April 27, 1848.
(2) The commissioners' court of said county, on November 16, 1876, made and entered upon the minutes of said court the following order:
(3) On April 15, 1878, said Wilson and Burke, as commissioners for Brazoria county, sold said land to W. H. Day for the consideration of $500 cash, and his promissory note for $3,324.55, payable ten years after date, with interest at the rate of 10 per cent. per annum, payable annually, and executed a deed therefor, retaining the vendor's lien to secure the payment of said note. Said deed recited that it was executed by virtue of the order above set out, and a copy of which was attached to said deed and made a part thereof.
(4) On November 12, 1878, said Wilson and Burke made a written report of said sale to said commissioners' court in words and figures as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. Potter County
...Foard County v. Sandifer, 105 Tex. 420, 151 S. W. 523; Matagorda County v. Casey, 49 Tex. Civ. App. 35, 108 S. W. 476; Brazoria County v. Padgitt, 160 S. W. at page 1174. The Supreme Court the Tabor Case, while intimating that the contract did not relieve Tabor of an obligation to pay, held......
-
Gussett v. Nueces County
...a full and complete ratification of it." The Boydston Case has been cited with approval in other cases as follows: Brazoria County v. Padgitt (Civ. App.) 160 S. W. 1170; Brazoria County v. Rothe, 168 S. W. 70; Germo Mfg. Co. v. Coleman County (Civ. App.) 184 S. W. 1064; Galveston County v. ......
-
City of Corpus Christi v. Gregg
...Tex.Com.App., 254 S.W. 775; Carter-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Angelina County, 59 Tex.Civ.App. 310, 126 S.W. 293, wr. ref.; Brazoria County v. Padgitt, Tex.Civ.App., 160 S.W. 1170, wr. ref.; Mecom v. Ford, Tex.Civ.App., 256 S.W. 701, wr. Under Article XI, Section 5, Constitution of the State of Te......
-
Thomason v. Reed
...v. Wallace (Tex. Civ. App.) 38 S. W. 816; Club Land & Cattle Co. v. Dallas County (Tex. Civ. App.) 64 S. W. 872; Brazoria v. Padgitt (Tex. Civ. App.) 160 S. W. 1170; Foard Co. v. Sandifer, 105 Tex. 420, 151 S. W. It has also been held that the character of instrument as a conveyance is not ......